There's an argument that Under 10m vessels are a special case.
The Chronicle reported on
the Fisheries Bill debate highlighting the Under 10m sector's
concerns:
Fair deal for North East fishermen plea as Parliament debates new rules The
House of Commons is debating new laws which will set out rules for fishing in
UK waters once Brexit is complete where new fishing rules will need to be
established after Brexit
North East MPs are pushing the Government to back small-boat fishing
businesses, which play an important role in the economy in Tynemouth and
across the east coast of England.
The House of Commons is debating new laws which will set out rules for fishing
in UK waters once Brexit is complete. Although the UK has left the European
Union, the country is still currently obeying EU regulations.
Ministers say British boats will be allowed to catch more fish. However, they
will still be limited by quotas, and Tynemouth MP Sir Alan Campbell spoke in
the House of Commons to call for small boats to receive a bigger share of the
catch.
He said: "There is a fairness issue that we also need to address in the Bill,
and we have heard different views on it already in this debate - that is, the
fair distribution of quota, particularly to under-10-metre boats.
"Currently, they receive around 6%. If that was increased by 1% or 2%, that
would increase the quota for smaller boats by around a quarter. "They are the
backbone of many local fleets - North Shields in my constituency included -
and they should be, in my view, at the heart of a sustainable approach."
Sir Alan also said that all fish caught in UK waters should be landed at UK
ports, a measure that would bring in more revenue to ports on the east coast.
He said: "If fish are caught in UK waters, they ought to be landed in UK
ports, because the Bill is about jobs, and important though the catching
sector is, for every single job in the catching sector there are around nine
jobs on land.
Berwick MP Anne-Marie Trevelyan entitled to £17,000 payout after Boris Johnson
abolishes her job "The reality is that too many of our fishing ports struggle
to survive. Ports such as North Shields require constant investment, and
currently, for example, the protection jetty is being repaired using European
fisheries fund money."
According to the Government, the new legislation, known as the Fisheries Bill,
will be fairer than the EU rules it replaces.
George Eustice, the Secretary of State for the Environment, told the House of
Commons: "The common fisheries policy has long been seen by these coastal
communities as a policy that symbolised the unfairness of our EU membership
and the failure of EU policy.
"It has granted uncontrolled access to UK waters for EU vessels.
During the debate, George Eustace said:
I beg to move, That the Bill be now read a Second time. Fishing is at the
heart of coastal communities the length and breadth of the United Kingdom,
from the Shetland Islands all the way down to Cornwall and some of the
communities that I represent. Across the UK, the seafood sector employs
about 33,000 people in often dangerous work, and I would like to take this
opportunity to pay tribute to all our fishermen, who risk the perils of the
sea to bring fish to our tables, and, in particular, to remember the six
fishermen who sadly lost their lives last year.
Of course, the industry has also been hit hard by the impact of the
coronavirus on the export of fish, but once again, our resilient fishing
communities have shown real ingenuity by finding new ways to sell fresh fish
direct to our doors. However, the common fisheries policy has long been seen
by these coastal communities as a policy that symbolised the unfairness of
our EU membership and the failure of EU policy. It has granted uncontrolled
access to UK waters for EU vessels. It has given the European Commission the
legal right to trade UK fishing interests during international negotiations
with our neighbours such as Norway and the Faroes, and the principle of
relative stability has set in stone an anachronistic methodology for sharing
quota dating back to the 1970s, which is profoundly unfair to the UK fleet
and does not reflect the quantity of fish found in British waters.
For example, under relative stability, we receive just 10% of the overall
quota for Celtic sea haddock, but our zonal attachment analysis suggests
that our share should be around 50%. Overall, the UK fishing industry
currently has access to just around half of the fishing opportunities that
are in our waters, and that cannot be right. The CFP has also failed our
marine environment. The misallocation of fishing opportunities combined with
ill-conceived technical measures and a cumbersome decision-making process
that is slow to correct errors, have all taken their toll on the health of
our marine environment and the resources in our waters.
As we leave the European Union, we have the opportunity for the first time
in almost half a century to correct these shortcomings. The Bill before the
House today gives the UK the powers that it needs to chart a new course as
an independent coastal state. It gives us the powers we need to implement
the approach that we outlined in our fisheries White Paper published in
2018. The Bill sets out in statute the environmental and scientific
principles and objectives that will inform future policy. It creates a legal
requirement for a joint fisheries statement across the UK Administrations
relating to those objectives, and it creates a legal requirement for the
preparation of a series of fisheries management plans to ensure that
continuous progress towards our objectives is secured.
The Bill also gives us the power to control access by individual foreign
vessels to our exclusive economic zone. This includes the power to
stipulate, through a vessel licence, where in our EEZ a vessel may fish,
when it may fish there, what fish it may catch while there, and what type of
fishing gear it may or may not use. The ability to control and manage access
to our waters will be crucial to ensuring that a fairer sharing arrangement
prevails in future.
Victoria Prentiss The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Environment, Food and
Rural Affairs closed the debate:
It is a real privilege to close the debate on this important Bill. I will
try to address what I can in the moments I have, but where I do not, I
undertake to follow up specific issues with hon. Members directly; this has
been a very wide-ranging debate.
There has clearly been a lot of interest in the status of the negotiations
with the EU. Indeed, the Chairman of the Select Committee, my hon. Friend
Neil Parish, also raised the important negotiations that are going on with
Norway and the Faroes. I understand the level of interest, and of course I
share it, but this is not the place to discuss the current position of those
negotiations. The task before us tonight is to make progress with this
important Bill. It is a framework Bill that gives us the power to implement
whatever we obtain in the negotiations. The measures in the Bill are
required regardless of the outcome of the negotiations, and we must press on
with our legislative programme.
The Bill has been developed in collaboration with the Scottish, Welsh and
Northern Ireland Administrations, and with their help it has been improved.
As Mr Carmichael said, Minister Ewing recognised this last month when he
confirmed the Scottish Government’s recommendation of consent for the Bill,
saying:
“Unlike for other UK bills, the co-operative working between officials and
indeed ministers in the Scottish Government, the Department for Environment,
Food and Rural Affairs and the other devolved Administrations has
demonstrated what can be achieved”.
At their request, this Bill gives the devolved Administrations more powers
than ever to manage their fisheries. This is an opportunity to create
tailored approaches to fisheries management across the UK.
I pay tribute to my hon. Friend Douglas Ross. It is clear, on tonight’s
showing, that he will be an outstanding leader of the Scottish
Conservatives, and we have seen tonight—if we ever doubted—that he is very
firmly on the side of the Scottish fishing fleet. My hon. Friend Andrew
Bowie made an excellent speech, and I would also like to mention the
Under-Secretary of State for Scotland, my hon. Friend David Duguid, who,
because of his ministerial responsibilities, was unable to speak in the
debate. I think it is fair to say that the Scottish industry is well
represented in this House, as those Members take a great interest in every
decision that is taken.
In a perceptive speech, the right hon. Member for Orkney and Shetland said
that there is a great deal of consensus for what the Bill is trying to
achieve, and many Members from across the House spoke about getting the
balance right—namely, the complexities of managing a diverse ecosystem with
the interests of an equally diverse fishing fleet.
My right hon. Friend Theresa Villiers made a stand-out speech. Of course,
she helped to craft the Bill, and spoke passionately about its aims and
objectives.
We heard some superb and wide-ranging Back-Bench speeches from across the
House. The issue of safety was rightly raised on both Front Benches, and
most passionately by my hon. Friends the Members for South East Cornwall
(Mrs Murray) and for North Devon (Selaine Saxby), Sir Alan Campbell, Sarah
Owen, who I welcome back from maternity leave, and many more Members across
the House. Much work is being done on the issue. As Members have said, there
is absolutely no need to wait for the outcome of the Bill to do this
important work, and it is right to say that the Department for Transport,
the Marine and Coastguard Agency, and Seafish are working hard on this
issue. Unusual though it may be, I pay tribute to the shadow Secretary of
State for the work that he has done to raise this issue again and again in
this place. It is not a matter particularly for tonight’s debate, but
definitely a matter of concern to all of us in this House—and that should
have been heard loud and clear.
Other speeches that stood out for me included that of the former Minister,
my right hon. Friend Mr Goodwill, who gave us an important historical
round-up of why we are here. On the specific point that he raised, I will
ask the Scallop Industry Consultation Group to raise the issue of gear
conflict. I undertake to report back to him on that.
Many Members encouraged us to eat more local fish and to promote British
seafood, and many noted what had been done during the pandemic to support
that and said how much more direct selling was being undertaken at the
moment. I refer specifically to my hon. Friend Lia Nici, who represents the
proud port of Grimsby, my hon. Friends the Members for Totnes (Anthony
Mangnall), for West Dorset (Chris Loder), for North West Durham (Mr Holden)
and for Witney (Robert Courts)—all of them proud eaters of seafood who were
encouraging their constituents to be the same—and, of course, my hon. Friend
Sir David Amess. I am not sure that it is Government policy yet that
Southend should become a city, but there can be no doubt that he sticks up
for the rights of his fishing industry and the rights of his people to eat
what they produce.
We also heard some passionate speeches about the marine environment from
Kerry McCarthy and my hon. Friend Robert Courts. The strong voice of
Cornwall was heard around the Chamber and, indeed, acknowledged by Dave
Doogan, who accepted that many of the issues raised mirror those of his own
fishermen. It is great to have so many Cornish colleagues who, in their own
words, would say that they had done a proper job at standing up for the
industry. My hon. Friend Cherilyn Mackrory, who is married to a fisherman,
cannot be here tonight, but we heard strongly about the worries that Cornish
colleagues have about the inshore fleet. I would like to reassure them that
we are working with a number of recently formed groups—again, supported by
Seafish—to collaborate on more sustainable management for specific stocks
such as whelks and crabs. We have noted that parts of the industry have had
louder voices than others in the past, and these new groups are an attempt
to address that.
I should also mention the work of REAF, the Renaissance of East Anglian
Fisheries, which was referred to by my hon. Friend James Wild and my hon.
Friend Peter Aldous, who mentions it frequently in this place. Its report
contains some excellent ideas, which the Government will continue to look
into.
Fisheries management plans will revolutionise how we manage our precious
fisheries. They will allow us to take a holistic approach to management,
managing fisheries at an appropriate level, not fettered by lines on maps or
differences between inshore and offshore, between Inshore Fisheries and
Conservation Authorities districts or even between Administrations. We will
continue to work with industry and interested parties in a much closer way,
developing plans together and ensuring that we use the best possible
evidence and local knowledge, so that we can create a management for
fisheries that is truly appropriate.
A number of Members mentioned funding. Of course, with a fairer share of
fish and more opportunities, we expect that profitability and investment in
the sector will increase. However, we recognise that this will take time, so
I would like to restate that the Government will maintain funding for
fisheries across the UK’s nations throughout the Parliament, as we said in
our manifesto commitment. The Bill provides new, expanded funding powers,
which will allow us to fund infrastructure such as port development and
training—I see the right hon. Member for Tynemouth nodding; I know that that
has long been a concern of his. These new domestic funding schemes will
support our priorities, and as a devolved matter, each Administration will
lead on their own programme.
We all recognise the importance of the inshore sector, not just our Cornish
colleagues. I am really pleased that, over the summer, tourists have been
able to travel to our coastal communities and enjoy the very best of what
our seas have to offer. As a family, we enjoyed some wonderful weather in
Tenby over the weekend. It has been rather a shock to come back, straight
into this important Bill. I would like to take this opportunity to
congratulate those seafood businesses that have adapted and innovated as a
result of the pandemic and are encouraging more and more people to eat
locally caught and directly sourced fish. We are determined to continue to
work on this as a Government; it is a real priority for us.
Fishing is a key part of our heritage as an island nation. The injustices
felt by so many concerning the common fisheries policy loomed large in the
debate over our decision to leave the EU. This Bill gives us the opportunity
to put that right and reclaim our position as an independent coastal state.
It is a framework Bill, and I look forward to working across the House to
put meat on the bones of the Bill, but it does what it needs to do, which is
give us the powers we need to act in a flexible and responsive way,
providing sustainable fisheries for future generations. I commend the Bill
to the House.
Question put, That the amendment be made.
Today a joint statement was made by the SFF and NFFO on Brexit
negotiations:
Elspeth Macdonald and Barrie Deas, chief executives of the Scottish
Fishermen’s Federation (SFF) and National Federation of Fishermen’s
Organisations (NFFO) respectively, said: “For the fishing industry in the
UK, leaving the Common Fisheries Policy has always been about redressing a
fundamental issue: the woefully unfair allocation of quota shares in our
waters, where the EU fleet has an unfettered right of access to the UK’s
rich fishing grounds and fish five times more in UK waters than we fish in
theirs.
“The only satisfactory means of ensuring that this is achieved is for the
UK, as a sovereign coastal state, to maintain full control over access to
our waters.
“That does not mean denying EU vessels access to fish in the UK Exclusive
Economic Zone. Rather, that such access would be negotiated annually – as
is the norm for the EU and Norway and other non-EU fishing nations.
“Under international law, this will be the default position if a Fisheries
Agreement cannot be reached.
“Evidently, it would be preferable if the right deal could be agreed,
meeting the industry’s objective of control of access to fish in the UK
EEZ and fairer quota shares based on zonal attachment, but if an
acceptable deal cannot be reached then the catching sector would prefer
these issues to be addressed through the annual negotiations process. This
is in line with the government’s negotiating position, which we fully
support.
“Ultimately, it is up to the EU which of the two routes it wishes to take
towards the UK becoming a coastal state – through a stable framework
agreement that respects UK sovereignty and follows similar arrangements
that the EU has with other coastal states in the north-east Atlantic, or
via a more uncertain route for the EU where everything is done through
annual negotiations with no framework agreement in place.”
Click below to hear Plymouth MP Luke Pollard discuss the Fisheries Bill and Brexit.
