Welcome to Through the Gaps, the UK fishing industry's most comprehensive information and image resource. Newlyn is England's largest fish market and where over 50 species are regularly landed from handline, trawl, net, ring net and pot vessels including #MSC Certified #Hake, #Cornish Sardine, handlined bass, pollack and mackerel. Art work, graphics and digital fishing industry images available from stock or on commission.
Wednesday 28 November 2018
Gales and more gales - mid-week market in Newlyn.
not all boats target cuttles at this time of year, the sum total of cuttlefish for the beam trawler Filadelfia - showing just how territorial these fish are - if you're not in the right place you won't catch them...
but the big man did pick up a few conger...
while the Rowney managed a few red mullet...
and the handliners picked up plenty of mackerel in St Ives Bay - those that braved the heavy weather anyway...
just enough to keep the buyers happy knowing that by the end of the week there won't be any fish on the market owing to the continuing poor weather when boats will only just start to head back to sea later in the week...
young Mr Curtis does love his quality flats...
cousins to the Dover sole...
looks like the cuttles have picked up over the last few weeks for the big boats...
leaving the market floor awash with...
the sepia ink for which they are renowned - the ink is used in cooking as a flavouring and as a natural colourant for things like pasta...
the Sapphire III landed a ew Dovers...
to go with the monk tails...
and plaice from the Billy Rowney...
Mark also sneaked a few JDs ashore...
assorted head and ear-warming wear...
as the buyers bid on the last few boxes of the auction...
the fish gets hauled away by forklift...
to the waiting transport...
and that's it for another day.
Tuesday 27 November 2018
Landing Obligation and other crucial EU fishing regulation debate.
Industry representatives and researchers give evidence on EU fisheries regulations
The EU Energy and Environment Sub-Committee asks fisheries researchers and representatives of the fishing industry for their views on the implementation and enforcement of the EU landing obligation.
- Parliament TV: Implementation and enforcement of the EU landing obligation
- Inquiry: Implementation and enforcement of the EU landing obligation
- EU Energy and Environment Sub-Committee
Witnesses
Wednesday 28 November in Committee Room 2, Palace of Westminster
At 10.15am
- Hazel Curtis, Chief Economist, Seafish
- Dr Tom Catchpole, Principle Fisheries Advisor, Cefas
At 11.15am
- Barrie Deas, Chief Executive, The National Federation of Fishermen’s Organisations
- Mike Park OBE, Chief Executive, Scottish White Fish Producers Association Limited
Background
The EU landing obligation seeks to gradually eliminate discarding (throwing unwanted fish back into the sea) by requiring all catches of specified types of fish to be landed. It has been implemented in stages, beginning in 2015; by 1 January 2019 it will apply to all fish stocks for which the EU sets a Total Allowable Catch.
Implementation presents challenges, particularly in relation to 'choke species'. These are species with a low volume of quota, that when reached will cause fishing operations to halt, even if quota is still available for other species, because fishermen will no longer be able to discard fish they catch over-quota. How enforcement agencies will monitor compliance with the landing obligation is another challenge that will need to be addressed.
Implementation presents challenges, particularly in relation to 'choke species'. These are species with a low volume of quota, that when reached will cause fishing operations to halt, even if quota is still available for other species, because fishermen will no longer be able to discard fish they catch over-quota. How enforcement agencies will monitor compliance with the landing obligation is another challenge that will need to be addressed.
Likely areas of discussion
- The scale of the problem 'choke species' is likely to pose.
- Whether changing fishing methods, or swapping quota with others, can alleviate this challenge.
- How enforcement agencies can best monitor compliance.
- Whether the landing obligation could result in increased levels of illegal discarding.
- What the UK could learn from other countries.
There will be a post to the live broadcast on Through the Gaps at 10:15am tomorrow - put it in your diary!
Labels:
discards,
EU. regulations,
fishing,
landing obligation,
LO
Monday 26 November 2018
NFF BREXIT view - Fishing is Centre Stage
The Withdrawal Agreement and Political Statement on the UK’s future relationship with the EU has put fishing in the spotlight. The NFFO looks at what is at stake.
When the UK leaves the EU, under international law, it will automatically assume the rights and responsibilities of an independent Coastal State. The Political Statement, agreed last weekend recognises this change in legal status, subject to a 21 month transitional period. References are made to:
- Regulatory Autonomy
- It is accepted that the UK would negotiate as an independent party to manage shared stocks sustainably
- Access to fish in UK waters, or for UK vessels to fish in EU waters would be subject to negotiation
Trade and Fishing Rights
The EU27 in its original negotiating mandate, and in statements made subsequently, have said any future trade deal will be contingent on the continuation of the status quo on access rights and quota shares. The UK, on the other hand, has been equally adamant that:
- There should be no linkage between an agreement on trade and fishing rights
- Access to UK waters for EU fleets will not be automatic
- Quota shares will have to change to more closely reflect the proportion of fish that are in UK waters (as the EU already recognises in its dealings with Norway)
The EU is occupying an uncomfortable position on this because there is no example of a trade deal current anywhere in the world which includes terms which require one party to grant free access to the natural resources of the other party. The EU’s position if applied to, say, a West African country, would rightly be regarded as a form of exploitative neo-colonialism.
Fishing and Politics
Fishing rights are already highly politically charged in the context of Brexit. The fishing industry sees Brexit as an opportunity to righting the wrong done when its interests were sacrificed in 1974. Fishing, perhaps easier to understand in its essentials than complex trade issues, has become a litmus test for Brexit. The parliamentary arithmetic since the last General Election has served to intensify the focus on fishing rights. With a Government that does not hold a majority in Parliament, fishing has become critical for the survival of the Government. In this context it will be important for the Government that any new fisheries agreement with the EU could not be portrayed as another sell-out. The symbolism of fishing is huge.
On the other side of the Channel, France, Denmark, Netherlands, Belgium, Ireland and Spain, stand to lose a very great deal because the CFP and the principle of equal access has worked heavily to their advantage for 45 years. Quota shares are a zero-sum game.
EU vessels catch around six times as much in UK waters as UK vessels catch in EU waters. The CFP’s quota share formula Relative Stability, agreed in 1983, enshrined many examples of extreme distortions that have worked systematically to the UK’s disadvantage for 45 years, the most extreme example being Channel cod where the UK’s share is 9%, whilst France’s is 84%). This asymmetrical and exploitative relationship is now under threat.
No Sell-Out
A crystal ball is not required to foresee that the issue of fishing rights will remain in the political and media spotlight until a new equilibrium is found. The EU will apply maximum pressure to keep the current arrangements on access and quota shares, for the simple reason that these work massively to the EU’s advantage. The only scenario in which that is likely to happen is if the UK choses to remain within the EU (and therefore the CFP) in a second referendum.
Politically, the UK Government can’t afford not to deliver on fishing. From an economic point of view both sides want and need an ambitious free trade deal. The politics however will take priority. The EU will not agree to a trade deal which gives the same benefits to a non-member. The UK has its own internal political dynamics in which fishing will remain as a visible symbol of Brexit, perhaps the only aspect of Brexit where there is utter clarity. Whatever their other differences, there is cross-party consensus that the UK fishing industry has been appallingly treated by the Common Fisheries Policy, and that leaving the EU opens the prospect of doing something different – the one area in which the UK has an unambiguously strong hand to play.
The fishing issue will not diminish in significance whilst these political dynamics are in play and whilst the UK fishing industry and its allies seek justice.
Legal Shift
Beneath the politics, there is no disguising that there has been a seismic legal shift. As the UK leaves the EU it, by default, becomes an independent coastal state. It would take a betrayal of biblical magnitude for any British government to voluntarily cede its legal rights (and the benefits to exploit the natural marine resources in its own waters, which come with those rights) by buckling to EU pressure. It did happen before. Deft manoeuvring by the EU and a UK Government desperate to join the EEC fishing, delivered an asymmetric and exploitative relationship on fishing for 45 years. The political and legal dynamics are, however, very different this time round.
The Political Statement makes provision for a deal to be struck on fishing before July 2020, in preparation for the usual autumn fisheries negotiations. Both parties are legally obliged to cooperate on the management of shared stocks. But for the UK, the status quo on access and quota shares is not an option.
What do we want?
To understand what is at stake, it is only necessary to look across the North Sea at the EU’s current relationship with Norway on fishing.
- Norway is an independent coastal state, outside the Common Fisheries Policy
- EU and Norway successfully cooperate on the sustainable management of shared stocks
- Annual fisheries negotiations, within a framework agreement, determine total allowable catches, access arrangements and quota shares
- Respective quota shares are based on an objective assessment of the resources in each other’s exclusive economic zones (zonal attachment)
- If the annual negotiations fail to achieve agreement by the end of each year (as sometimes happens) EU vessels do not have access to Norwegian waters from 1st January and Norwegian vessels do not have access to EU waters, until a new deal is struck sometime in the New Year
- Unutilised quotas are exchanged annually on a balanced and reciprocal basis
This is what we want. And it should flow naturally from our new legal status as we leave the EU.
Political Statement on the UK/EU’s Future Economic Partnership
XII. FISHING OPPORTUNITIES
73. The Parties should cooperate bilaterally and internationally to ensure fishing at sustainable levels, promote resource conservation, and foster a clean, healthy and productive marine environment, noting that the United Kingdom will be an independent coastal state.
74. While preserving regulatory autonomy, the Parties should cooperate on the development of measures for the conservation, rational management and regulation of fisheries, in a non-discriminatory manner. They will work closely with other coastal states and in international fora, including to manage shared stocks.
75.Within the context of the overall economic partnership the Parties should establish a new fisheries agreement on, inter alia, access to waters and quota shares.
76. The Parties will use their best endeavours to conclude and ratify their new fisheries agreement by 1 July 2020 in order for it to be in place in time to be used for determining fishing opportunities for the first year after the transition period.
Further information and contact details from the NFFO website here:
Further information and contact details from the NFFO website here:
Episode 5 of the fishing videos - and this week it's Mr Paul Trebilcock, head man at the CFPO.
Episode five of the CFPO fishing videos finds the film crew talking to CEO Paul Trebilcock down in Newlyn where the PO is based in an office overlooking Eng;an's biggest fishing port.
Further information and details of the work of the CFPO can be found on their website here:
Labels:
CFPO
Monday morning in Newlyn
A familiar sight for all those fishermen working on bigger boats, leggings and boots always at the ready...
Monday's auction is well underway with the buyers busy bidding on a few boxes of hake from the Govenek of Ladram...
most of the fish this morning was from the inshore trawlers who fished a quieter spell of weather over the weekend like the Harvest Reaper and her fine pair of ray wings...
and several boxes of big flat fish...
- but can you name both species?..
John Dory are not so difficult to ID...
the porters waster no time in whisking away fish that has been bought...
the Sea Spray has been mixing it with the mackerel again...
"make me an offer" says Colin...
big, beautiful bass...
and there are still good hauls of heavenly erring being put ashore...
along with the odd bream...
plaice from the trawler, New Venture...
while the only beam trawl fish came from the Filadelfia with some big ray...
and a box of those slippery eels that still give some fishermen the heebie-jeebies...
biggest of all the inshore landings came from young Roger Nowell on the Imogen III with a decent shot of squid...
and his favourite tipple, those golden John Dory...
and touched on the omni-present haddock of course...
as did Tom on the Harvest Reaper...
on an otherwise grey day...
the eating end of a cuttlefish...
the alien-like crayfish...
a couple of big Govenek hake...
heading towards the longest night of the year its is still dark enough at 7am...
though unusually, there are still a few bog yachts stopping over in the harbour at this time of year...
all you need to keep a beam trawler's gear in one piece, chain links and more chain links...
Galilee, looking smarter by the day...
just the five HGV vehicles in the lorry park this morning.
Sunday 25 November 2018
Brexit - a political viewpoint picking up on, "should build on, inter alia, existing reciprocal access and quota shares"
Chris Higgins, Senior lecturer in Politics at the University of Suffolk with an interest in Fishing has weighed in with these observations on the exchanges being tweeted between various sectors and interested parties on Twitter and other social media:
"Seeing lots of this sort of stuff with people unhappy about Brexit and fishing. So let's unpack the issue to get a more informed take."
Here's the bit causing all the kerfuffle. It's in the declaration regarding the withdrawal agreement and political declaration. Main controversy is this phrase: "should build on, inter alia, existing reciprocal access and quota shares"
First thing's firstst. Given presence of shared fish stocks straddling the UK's & EU's (& Norway's/Faroes') EEZs, UK must strike fisheries agreements with neighbouring coastal states. If you object to idea of fisheries agreements with other coastal states, Brexit wasn't a good idea. Making fisheries agreements is literally what independent coastal states do. The fact UK would enter into one does not mean that it'll continue to be in CFP (eg Norway has a fisheries agreement with the EU, but it's not in CFP & retains full control over fishing in its EEZ)
Secondly, phrase "should build on" doing lots of work here. I see two aspects to this.
1. Existing arrangements offer a baseline/starting point to come to new agreement, rather than a cut & paste of existing rules. It's perhaps helpful words designed to get agreement through
2. It's likely any new UK fisheries policy will have some sort of transition to new rules. This would be similar to recent Faroes fisheries reform which effectively bans foreign ownership of licences, but allows for a 6 year transition period So for absolute clarity - after the transition period the UK will leave the CFP & on fishing within its EEZ can do whatever it wants, including negotiating a new agreement with EU on fishing. But we need also need to be honest that fishing does not operate in isolation.
Whether you like it or not trade is crucial to fishing. It's impossible to separate them and many of the examples some use to say it is possible actually don't hold up (eg Norway's is out of CFP, but also faces tariffs & limited tariff-free quotas on many seafood products)
This gets us onto three wider points.
First, this is a high stakes international negotiation. UK has interests and EU has interests. Don't be surprised that the EU is pushing its interests. If you don't like it - tough. Brexit will involve many more of these tensions/trade-offs.
Second, there's a wider diplomatic point we need to consider here. If the UK says it wants a close relationship with the EU and nice shiny trade deals with the rest of the world - well the EU and the rest of the world are watching the UK's behaviour.
Third, don't forget some of this from the EU side is for domestic consumption. Like the UK fishing industry, industries in other EU member states are relatively small, and feel their interests are traded off by their respective governments (sound familiar?)
https://christopherhuggins.uk/post/20181121_eu_fishing_concerns/
So to recap.
On fishing, the UK can do whatever it wants after the transition period. But we have to be upfront and honest about the trade-offs involved in fisheries policy. Government and politicians have a responsibility here. At the moment we have empty commitments being given to the industry, promising to deliver the undeliverable. This is eroding trust which will ultimately lead to bad fisheries policy. Rather than telling the industry it can achieve the unachievable, there needs to be more dialogue. Government needs to be honest about what's at stake in the negotiations, and this means talking to all of the industry about what could work rather than making false promises."
What do you think?
"Seeing lots of this sort of stuff with people unhappy about Brexit and fishing. So let's unpack the issue to get a more informed take."
Here's the bit causing all the kerfuffle. It's in the declaration regarding the withdrawal agreement and political declaration. Main controversy is this phrase: "should build on, inter alia, existing reciprocal access and quota shares"
First thing's firstst. Given presence of shared fish stocks straddling the UK's & EU's (& Norway's/Faroes') EEZs, UK must strike fisheries agreements with neighbouring coastal states. If you object to idea of fisheries agreements with other coastal states, Brexit wasn't a good idea. Making fisheries agreements is literally what independent coastal states do. The fact UK would enter into one does not mean that it'll continue to be in CFP (eg Norway has a fisheries agreement with the EU, but it's not in CFP & retains full control over fishing in its EEZ)
Secondly, phrase "should build on" doing lots of work here. I see two aspects to this.
1. Existing arrangements offer a baseline/starting point to come to new agreement, rather than a cut & paste of existing rules. It's perhaps helpful words designed to get agreement through
2. It's likely any new UK fisheries policy will have some sort of transition to new rules. This would be similar to recent Faroes fisheries reform which effectively bans foreign ownership of licences, but allows for a 6 year transition period So for absolute clarity - after the transition period the UK will leave the CFP & on fishing within its EEZ can do whatever it wants, including negotiating a new agreement with EU on fishing. But we need also need to be honest that fishing does not operate in isolation.
Whether you like it or not trade is crucial to fishing. It's impossible to separate them and many of the examples some use to say it is possible actually don't hold up (eg Norway's is out of CFP, but also faces tariffs & limited tariff-free quotas on many seafood products)
This gets us onto three wider points.
First, this is a high stakes international negotiation. UK has interests and EU has interests. Don't be surprised that the EU is pushing its interests. If you don't like it - tough. Brexit will involve many more of these tensions/trade-offs.
Second, there's a wider diplomatic point we need to consider here. If the UK says it wants a close relationship with the EU and nice shiny trade deals with the rest of the world - well the EU and the rest of the world are watching the UK's behaviour.
Third, don't forget some of this from the EU side is for domestic consumption. Like the UK fishing industry, industries in other EU member states are relatively small, and feel their interests are traded off by their respective governments (sound familiar?)
https://christopherhuggins.uk/post/20181121_eu_fishing_concerns/
So to recap.
On fishing, the UK can do whatever it wants after the transition period. But we have to be upfront and honest about the trade-offs involved in fisheries policy. Government and politicians have a responsibility here. At the moment we have empty commitments being given to the industry, promising to deliver the undeliverable. This is eroding trust which will ultimately lead to bad fisheries policy. Rather than telling the industry it can achieve the unachievable, there needs to be more dialogue. Government needs to be honest about what's at stake in the negotiations, and this means talking to all of the industry about what could work rather than making false promises."
What do you think?
Labels:
CFP. Brexit
‘We want a better deal’: talking Brexit aboard a fishing trawler
A few days ago Sam Wollaston arrived safely back on shore after spending four days aboard the largest trawler left working from Newlyn - here, on the eve of the final Brexit process is what he learned:
"Out of an apocalyptic yellow sky a salvo of white missiles rains down, plummeting into an angry black sea. Gannets, here for a free lunch. It’s hauling time on Crystal Sea, and for any young gurnard or whiting small and determined enough to wriggle free at this stage, just before the net is lifted from the water, liberty is short-lived. The escapee is snatched, underwater, then launched rudely up into the sky where it quickly disappears, headfirst, into a seabird, accompanied by a triumphant squawk. This is not a good place to be a fish
Crystal Sea is a 20-metre twin-rig stern trawler, one of the bigger boats operating out of Newlyn in Cornwall. Twin rig means she drags two nets, side by side. She catches a mix of fish, up to 30 different species, operating anywhere between six and 120 miles from home. In the four days I am on board – to get a Brexit perspective from 49° 48’N, 5° 48’W and thereabouts, as well as to get some idea of what this very tough job involves – we are mainly between 10 and 20 miles from shore."
The birds are joined by dolphins, in from the flank, five or six of them, leaping joyfully from the face of a wave. They like the company, the skipper Dave Stevens likes to think, and he likes theirs; it’s reassuring. They’re not here for a meal, though – they’re here for the show. And what a spectacle it is, all that colour and splashing and dive-bombing. It’s beautiful and thrilling, horrific and terrifying, all at the same time. What a racket, too: the avian screeching, the grinding of the trawler’s main power winch, the metallic clanking of chain and trawl doors, the howl of a south-westerly force 7. There’s a bit of human yelling, too, men trying to be heard above the elements.
In the wheelhouse, Dave turns the boat through 90 degrees, so that the net moves from the back to the side. Operating the smaller winch, Latvian fisherman Girts Kraulis hoists the dripping trawl up out of the sea, a huge teardrop of fish, some with their heads poking through the holes, as if taking one last look at the world they’re leaving.
Braced on the pitching deck, Girts’s countryman Robert Vimba helps to manoeuvre the net into the bag hatch. Girts lowers it to the fish deck below, where Robert’s twin brother Edgar unties the bottom of the cod end and the catch spills out into the fish hopper.
No cod today, but plenty of other fish: haddock and John Dory, plaice, sole, squid and cuttlefish (the ink from which has squirted over some of the others). The dead and the dying nearly reach the top of Edgar’s boots. A crab makes a vain dash for it, a dogfish writhes, the last pulses of life travel along the fins of the flatfish. A big monkfish yawns, opening up a vast and ancient cavern full of stalagmites and stalactites. Soon it will have its head hacked off (monkfish go to market without their heads: too ugly). Heads you lose, tails you also lose – or win, if you’re the fishermen: they like monkfish, and John Dory, which fetch a good price.
![]() |
Girt Kraulis winches the catch into the fish hatch. Photograph: Antonio Olmos for the Guardian |
Now Girts, Robert and Edgar stand in a line at a conveyor belt with their knives, gutting, sorting, discarding, chopping the wings off the rays, which will be skate when they get to the fishmonger. Dave joins them, keeping an eye on the screen which shows where they are at sea, and if there are any other vessels they are in danger of colliding with. There’s not much banter, very little chat even; they just get on with it.
The fish is washed, sorted and sized, lowered further down into the refrigerated hold, where it is packed with ice in boxes and stacked. By which time the nets will have already been out again for a couple of hours, ready to haul again in another three. It’s relentless, working on a trawler.
Crystal Sea is a 20-metre twin-rig stern trawler, one of the bigger boats operating out of Newlyn in Cornwall. Twin rig means she drags two nets, side by side. She catches a mix of fish, up to 30 different species, operating anywhere between six and 120 miles from home. In the four days I am on board – to get a Brexit perspective from 49° 48’N, 5° 48’W and thereabouts, as well as to get some idea of what this very tough job involves – we are mainly between 10 and 20 miles from shore.
At 10 years old, she is also one of the newer and better-equipped boats operating out of Newlyn. As well as all the mechanical gear a modern trawler has – winches and cranes, conveyor belts and ice-makers, the navigational equipment, GPS and radar – there’s a washing machine. The galley has a cooker, fridge, toaster and a deep-fat fryer. There’s a telly, on, loud, all the time – Homes Under The Hammer, Bargain Hunt, Scotland-Fiji in the rugby – even though there’s no time to watch. There’s even wifi, via a satellite.
If I’m making it sound comfortable, it isn’t. Crystal Sea is a working fishing boat, damp and cramped. The cabin is especially hellish, down a ladder into a hot dark smelly hole below the waterline where you have to fumble to find your bunk. At the same level but forward of here, through a bulkhead, the fish sleep on ice.
Dave Stevens’ family, from St Ives, have been fishing for generations, Dave has been doing it for 29 years, since he was 15. Now he works the boat with his brother Alec, and they do alternate weeks. It gets harder as you get older, Dave says. A big bear of a man – all the men are big – he’s unflustered, traditional, thoughtful and softly spoken, with a gentle Cornish accent.
The crew commute from Latvia to Cornwall: two months on, one off, leaving friends and family behind
Girts, aged 47, and the Vimba brothers, 32 (it’s hard to tell them apart when they’re in their oilskins and you can’t see Edgar’s tattoos) are from the port of Ventspils on the Baltic. They commute from Latvia to Cornwall: two months on, one off, leaving friends and family behind. Girts’s daughter joined him for a bit, got a job in a crab factory, but now she’s back home studying law. On the boat, Girts’s mood is directly proportional to both the weather and how the fishing is going. The men, including Dave, are paid on a share-of-catch basis; on a good week, they can net a grand each.
![]() |
The haul coming in. Photograph: Antonio |
Edgar doesn’t have a family, but Robert has a wife and two kids with another on the way. She would like to come over; he’s not sure about it. He’s at sea, there’s no family to support her here – and if she went back to work, it would probably be to a crab factory, whereas in Latvia she’s got a nice office job for a fuel company. None of them know how their lives will be affected by Brexit.
A high-pressure system is expected imminently from the south, bringing fair, settled weather after 45 years of storms and poor fishing. Or this is how Brexit looks to Dave, and to the 92% of the British fishing industry who in June 2016 voted to leave the EU. (Dave can’t imagine who the 8% are; probably people with some kind of European financial interest, he says.) And to be honest, it’s not hard to understand why he and other British fishermen haven’t exactly felt the love towards Brussels, even for a die-hard remainer.
![]() |
Skipper Dave Stevens gives instructions aboard Crystal Sea. Photograph: Antonio Olmos for the Guardian |
As a member (just) of the EU, Britain is signed up to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), which means we do not control our own waters. All the rules – about catches, quotas, discards – come from the European Commission. Fish are seen as a common resource; waters are shared; you fish in mine, I’ll fish in yours. Voulez-vous pêcher avec moi, ce soir? It sounds like the very spirit of European unity and collaboration, but if you speak to Dave, or any other British fisherman or fisherwoman (a rare species in British waters), they’ll tell you it simply isn’t fair. Britain has some of the best fishing grounds in Europe; suddenly, after 1973, we had to share them. So we’re free to fish in their waters, too? So what, we’re not bothered – the fishing’s fine at home.
![]() |
Edgar Vimba struggles to pull in the fishing net. Photograph: Antonio Olmos for the Guardian |
The stats underline this injustice. Some 40% of Denmark’s entire catch comes from British waters (the exclusive economic zone that extends to 200-nautical miles offshore). A study by the NAFC Marine Centre at the University of the Highlands, estimates that an average of 58% of fish and shellfish caught in UK waters was landed by boats from other EU countries between 2012 and 2014. Meanwhile, the Marine Management Organisation estimates that in 2015, only about 16% of fish and shellfish landed by UK vessels was caught in other EU member states’ waters. Dave has another way to describe what happened to his industry when Ted Heath took the country into the European Economic Community: “We were had.”
The total number of fishermen is now around 12,000, down from around 20,000 in the mid-90s. While the fishing industry plays a tiny part in the UK economy, it fights above its financial weight. Why? Because it’s the beating heart of coastal communities around the country; because it has shaped pretty harbours (as well as less pretty ones), inspired British folklore, literature and art; and, more recently, because a proud island state losing control of its territorial waters came to encapsulate a lot of what was wrong with EU membership. Since Dave has been fishing, he’s witnessed the decline of the industry first hand. The total number of fishermen is now around 12,000, down from around 20,000 in the mid-90s. The number of fishing boats in the UK fleet has fallen by 29% since 1996.
![]() |
The catch is spilled into the fish hopper. Photograph: Antonio Olmos for the Guardian |
Inevitably, fishing played its part in the referendum campaign. Remember Nigel Farage coming up the Thames on a fishing boat, throwing a few haddock around, trading insults with Bob Geldof on the good ship Remain? As well as the injustice of having to share fishing waters, Dave’s other big beef with the EU is all the top-down micromanagement. We speak while he is on watch, sitting in one of the surprisingly comfy chairs in the wheelhouse. “Most companies and organisations I know listen to their workforces, and that feedback works up through the chain, not the other way round. The CFP is trying to manage on such a large scale, it just won’t work. Fishing is different in many areas around EU waters.”
On quotas, for example, Dave thinks they’re not always getting it right. Sometimes the people who decide how much of one stock can be fished are working from data that is a few years old. “You need a more flexible approach. So if you’re catching too much of one species, it’s more abundant on the ground than the science would suggest – you should be able to take that species.”
![]() |
Skipper David Stevens looks out from the wheelhouse as the crew prepares for the nets to be pulled in. Photograph: Antonio Olmos for the Guardian. |
By take, he means keep, as opposed to discarding. On this trip he’s been discarding haddock, because he’s catching many more than he has a quota for. To see a beautiful freshly caught haddock going down the chute with the offal, dead, into the sea is a sickening sight, unless you’re a lazy gannet.
Dave says his leave vote wasn’t purely based on fishing; he made up his mind while visiting the EU headquarters in Brussels. He was there to make a presentation to a roundtable meeting about a filter that would allow smaller fish to escape the net, after which he went to meet his MEP, Julie Girling, in the chamber. The floor started to fill up, hundreds of people. “So I asked Julie, ‘Who are all these people? They can’t all be MEPs.’ And she said, ‘No, most are lobbyists, working for either NGOs or big chemical companies and the like.’ I was kind of taken aback. I’m not naive, I know that lobbying goes on – but it was the enormous scale of it. There must have been four or five lobbyists for every MEP.” He asked her how often she met her constituents, and she said it was quite rare for them to come to Brussels. “And I said, ‘That’s it, I’m out.’” When Dave talks about the hordes of circling lobbyists, it’s hard not to think of gannets.
![]() |
The catch is gutted and processed. Photograph: Antonio Olmos for the Guardian |
As we talk in the wheelhouse, he’s keeping an eye on what’s going on, outside, and on the panel of screens in front of him. One shows where we are, and who else is around (there are no other fishing boats); another shows the topography of the seafloor; a third shows the F1 Grand Prix from Brazil (we have Sky Sports, too). A big white splodge on the radar is an approaching squall. They generally seem to hit at hauling time.
Gale warning issued: 09.50 on Mon 12 Nov 2018 UTC. South-westerly gale force 8 expected soon. Wind: westerly or south-westerly 5-7, occasionally gale 8 in north. Sea state: rough or very rough. Weather: thundery showers. Visibility: mainly good.
Today there are no high-pressure systems coming from the south, bringing fair or settled weather. The conditions are “poor”, as Dave says, with characteristic understatement, for the whole trip. Strong winds, big seas, five-metre waves; this is about the worst weather they go out in, and why we’re at sea for just four days, instead of the usual six.
![]() |
Fish are stored on ice in the hold. Photograph: Antonio Olmos for the Guardian |
But even storm clouds have silver linings. Being one of the bigger boats in the fleet means Crystal Sea is one of the few that will be out in these conditions. One of the larger beam trawlers from Newlyn had to be towed home by a sister ship due to engine trouble in the night. But we’re still catching fish – a lot of fish, and good fish: plenty of John Dory and monkfish. And because rough weather means fewer fish coming in, the price tends to go up as the Beaufort scale does.
From where I’m standing – or trying to stand – it looks both dangerous and bloody hard work
But the crew’s mood doesn’t get a similar bounce. “When it’s like this, shitty weather, it’s not great,” Girts says. I don’t think I’d want to be around Girts when the weather and the fishing were bad. “It’s not the best job in the world, it’s not the worst.”
Robert says it’s not so bad. Until recently he was on a crabbing boat, and that was more physical, with more lifting. But trawling is more dangerous, with all the heavy gear and cables and everything thrashing around in the big seas. “Every job is as dangerous as you make it, but we really are exposed,” Dave admits. He had an accident when he was 20, working on his dad’s boat north of Scilly. “A big piece of equipment came down, pinned me to the deck and crushed my leg. I was taken to shore by the lifeboat, I was lucky – then to Truro by air ambulance, where they patched me up.” Dave, not one to exaggerate, reckons that without the helicopter he probably wouldn’t have made it.
![]() |
A discarded lobster trap is brought on to deck. Photograph: Antonio Olmos for the Guardian |
From where I’m standing – or trying to stand – it looks both dangerous and bloody hard work. There is the sheer constant physicality of it – handling heavy warps and chains, pulling, tying, lifting – and the absolute relentlessness of it: haul, shoot the nets again, process, pack, store, grab a couple of hours’ sleep if you can, on watch, haul again, 24/7. Plus cooking, one proper meal a day, burgers and chips, stew, rice, no fish (I’m not surprised, I don’t feel like fish). Meanwhile everything and everywhere – your workplace, kitchen, bedroom, toilet – is bucking around like a bronco.
Of course there is a bloody great blue whale in the cabin here. Are the Latvian crew – Girts, Robert and Edgar – aware of the irony? Has the leave skipper not noticed that his workforce comes from another EU member state? Girts, whose English is the best of the three, tells me he’s concerned about the prospect of a hard Brexit, and what that would mean when it came to his right to live and work in Britain. Dave doesn’t think it will be an issue, even with a hard Brexit. “I don’t see them stopping people moving around Europe,” he says. “We believe in fair play,” he adds, old-fashionedly.
It has been hard to recruit locally. “It’s the fault of our industry, and the reputation our industry has,” Dave says. “People see it as a dangerous, dead-end job. All the talk in the media is that there are no fish left in the sea, we’re not sustainable, it’s all our fault – and it really is not like that.” He continues to look forward to having a mix of crew, from Latvia, the UK, wherever, just “the best guys to go to sea with”.
Dave is not even worried about European markets being closed to us. “We do £1bn worth of fish trade with the EU, they do similar trade with us, trade for trade it’s pretty equal,” he says. “But the EU has been a declining market for fish products from the UK for over 20 years now. We are looking at the Middle East, China. It is a truly global market and we’ve been selling into those markets for the last 10, 15 years. They’re growing all the time.”
A bigger worry for Dave is that the transition period, throughout which the UK will still be tied to the CFP, will drag on for years – more negotiations, new rules being drawn up, new quotas, new rights of access. Or that they will be betrayed again, as they were in 1973 – the government (whoever it is) trading access to British waters in order to secure more favourable terms in other, more profitable sectors. And it won’t just be a few haddock, it’ll be the entire UK fishing industry going down that offal chute to be fed to the gannets.
Right now though, there’s a boat to be unloaded. After four days out, Crystal Sea chugs slowly back in to Newlyn once there’s enough water to get in on the rising tide. Conditions aside, it has been a decent four days. In the hold there are 230 boxes of fish – monkfish, bream, ray wings, dover sole, sand sole, lemon sole, Cornish sole, all the soles, squid, cuttlefish, crab, conger eel, hake, lobster, plaice, gurnard, haddock, John Dory, octopus, red mullet, sea bass, lesser-spotted dogfish, smoothhounds, tope, turbot and whiting. 9,288kg in total. We’ve also brought back a tonne of rubbish, dragged up from the bottom of the sea – discarded crab and lobster pots; rusty old oil drums; a few trainers (there are usually trainers: they come from a container that fell off a ship 20 years ago, and are still being fished up); the vertebra of a large whale.
Dave’s dad, David Sr, 68, who doesn’t go to sea any more but is still very much involved, is on the quay to help unload and operate the crane. The boxes are lifted from the boat on to the waiting lorry, which leaves for Plymouth, where the fish will be sold in the morning. Most will go to the UK market – wholesalers, fishmongers. Some will probably go to Europe, still. Some might even go to the Middle East, or China.
Dave gets a week ashore, just in time to scrutinise Theresa May’s draft deal. He’ll be concerned about possible links between access to waters and trade. And about the transition period getting drawn out. But at least, during that time, he gets to keep his crew.
Edgar, Robert and Girts will sleep on the boat tonight, but it won’t be pitching about and they won’t have to get up through the night, pull on oilskins and boots. Tomorrow they’ll be off to sea again. This time the forecast isn’t so bad.
• Commenting on this piece? If you would like your comment to be considered for inclusion on Weekend magazine’s letters page in print, please email weekend@theguardian.com, including your name and address (not for publication).
Why did the fishing industry vote for Brexit?
In June 2016, a poll suggested that 92% of the fishing industry voted to leave the EU. After the trip Sam talked through his experience aboard the Crystal Sea with Anushka Asthana in a podcast.
As Anushka says in the podcast, you can follow the exploits of David and the Crystal Sea on Twitter - the account name is based on the name and port registration (St Ives) of the boat, Crystal Sea SS118.
At the time of the EU referendum in June 2016, a poll suggested that 92% of the fishing industry voted to leave the European Union. The question of fishing rights has remained a sticking point in negotiations ever since. Theresa May has so far agreed that the UK would be an independent coastal state after Brexit. But the final deal on fisheries can only be completed after the UK leaves the EU. The industry is nervous that it is going to be betrayed.
The Guardian’s Sam Wollaston spent four days on board the Crystal Sea, a fishing trawler based out of west Cornwall, to find out why this industry is so keen on Brexit.
Listen to skipper Dave Stevens in the Guardian’s Today In Focus podcast on Monday 26 November.
Many thanks to the Guardian for allowing the full story to be published here which can be found here:
Story by Sam Wollaston, photography by Antonio Olmos.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)