Last week, Google, Oceana and SkyTruth announced they were launching a battle against overfishing everywhere. A noble pursuit, Global Fishing Watch combines interactive mapping technology and satellite data with the all-important Automatic Identification System (AIS) transmissions every tanker, passenger ship and commercial vessel above a certain size is mandated by the UN to send. Global Fishing Watch then visualises the routes taken, to show when a fishing boat strays into or lingers in waters it shouldn't.
The only problem, maritime analytics company Windward tells us, is that any vessel engaging in illegal activities is gaming the system and manipulating AIS data. We can't rely on what we're seeing.
"Until 2012, AIS data was super reliable because it wasn't commoditised. Nobody had it, so no one needed to clean the data or check it," Ami Daniel, a former naval officer and cofounder of Windward, tells WIRED.co.uk. "Two years, there was suddenly so much data out there, so many open source portals like marinetraffic.com providing free access to [vessel positions] for everybody. People understood they were being looked at. Once that happened, spontaneously different industries started to manipulate the data."
According to a report by Windward that looked at AIS data from mid-2013 to mid-2014, there has been a 59 percent increase in GPS manipulations. From July 2012 to August 2014, that data also showed:
Final ports of call were reported only 41 percent of the time
1 percent of all ships used a fake identifying number (IMO) over the past year
A quarter of all vessels switch off their AIS at least 10 percent of the time
Windward is crunching AIS data -- the more than 100m shipping data points produced every day -- and satellite imagery with its algorithms, taking into account the aforementioned manipulations and comparing these against past behaviours, home ports and vessel ownership, as well as general trading patterns and economic profiles. Its software calculates how urgent the erroneous data stream is, then alerts its clients to the fact. These include oil and gas companies in South America and West Africa and governments in South East Asia and West Africa. Interested parties include navies, as well as national intelligence agencies.
There are many reasons a vessel would choose to manipulate its AIS transmissions. At the most serious end of the spectrum are the illegal activities. "The UN found a super strong connection between fishing and smuggling and terrorism," Daniel tells us. "Fishing vessels have defacto authorisation to enter any point they want in the world because the fishing industry is a global one. So it's not irregular for a vessel to go from Africa to Europe. Yet everything they do in open seas in between is unaccountable."
Human trafficking and smuggling are two of the most worrying reasons for manipulations. Then there are plenty of economics ones -- the vessels Google and co are trying to track, which are engaging in overfishing or fishing in restricted regions for profit. According to Windward's report, Chinese fishing vessels account for 44 percent of all GPS manipulations. "They want to fish wherever they want," says Daniel.
Read the full story from Wired.co.uk here:
Wednesday, 3 June 2015
Tiz a warmer Wednesday tiz is
Vapour and stone, Ying and Yang...
it's a Vision III...
the Devil walks in Newlyn...
prime fish fill the box...
as the buyers huddle round the only boat to sell today...
with most of the catch being turbot...
destined for restaurants with larger plates...
there must be a suitable size thing kind of caption to go with this...
more butt waiting to be sold...
traffic light colours...
mis en jour...
there seems to be some mending to do...
an old French stocking and other miscellaneous scrap fill yet another seabed litter bag...
two Scottish sterns...
no splices here...
the heart of a telecomms cable dragged from the seabed...
Cornish sterns...
and Cornish stems...
PZ36, the Ajax...
not a breath this morning in the harbour...
and at high water the boats cram the quays...
lights, camera, action the Newlyn Filmhouse in the making...
Seafood Cafe Mackerel Sky style...
ubiquitous food...
something for everyone's taste in the gallery on the bridge...
looking through the street view gaps...
portriats and...
and Newlyn School landscapes coming up for auction at WH Lane's - can you recognise the brushwork?...
Christo style, Lloyd's bank under wraps.
Tuesday, 2 June 2015
There's something in the Air.
Some of the local fleet might just have spotted one of the world's most expensive yachts as she steamed past Land's End destined for Cork.
She is available on charter at around £540,000 a week! - though even that kind of money doesn't buy you a fine forecast so she will be rolling like all other boats are in WSW force 7-8 winds this morning. The name of the actual owner of the yacht is still a mystery.
Geoff Lakeman and Seth Lakeman share the stage at the Coastguard Hotel, Mousehole
In a one off special night at the Coastguard with a gale of wind and hammering rain at the windows of the bar...
Newlyn born Geoff Lakeman and folk hero son Seth took to the stage and shared with us their own unique brand of music...
Tie 'Em Up is one of Geoff's many protest songs - this one citing the cause of Cornish and other fishermen forced to cede to 'days at sea' rules designed to restrict their fishing efforts and conserve stocks - in the UK's case often while boats from other states fish on...
then it was the turn of Seth playing on home turf in order to raise awareness and money in Penlee lifeboat's quest to build a more suitable lifeboat house in Newlyn...
and of course the night wouldn't be completre without the song Solomon Brown penned by Seth from his Poor Man's Heaven album - the song is a tribute to the men of the Penlee lifeboat lost with all hands and members of the Union Star crew who were all lost during a storm just a mile down the coast from where Seth was singing tonight.
Hopefully, the weather will have moderated for the duo when they head off to the Scillys in the morning aboard the Scillonian III for another gig on Tresco.
A great night for all those lucky enough to get tickets - made even more memorable for a taste of locally brewed and highly recommended Screach cider and a magical mystery tour of West Penwith courtesy of the FirstGroup's Mousehole bus back to Penzanve via ll
Newlyn born Geoff Lakeman and folk hero son Seth took to the stage and shared with us their own unique brand of music...
Tie 'Em Up is one of Geoff's many protest songs - this one citing the cause of Cornish and other fishermen forced to cede to 'days at sea' rules designed to restrict their fishing efforts and conserve stocks - in the UK's case often while boats from other states fish on...
then it was the turn of Seth playing on home turf in order to raise awareness and money in Penlee lifeboat's quest to build a more suitable lifeboat house in Newlyn...
Hopefully, the weather will have moderated for the duo when they head off to the Scillys in the morning aboard the Scillonian III for another gig on Tresco.
A great night for all those lucky enough to get tickets - made even more memorable for a taste of locally brewed and highly recommended Screach cider and a magical mystery tour of West Penwith courtesy of the FirstGroup's Mousehole bus back to Penzanve via ll
Newlyn fish on the menu @ Royal Cornwall Show.
VISITORS to next week's Royal Cornwall Show will be able to enjoy a seafood treat thanks to Cornwall Food and Drink.
The Great Cornish Fish marquee is a hotbed of culinary creativity, where show visitors can explore just what's so special about Cornish fish and discover why it has developed such a huge reputation throughout the world.
It will feature free seafood skills master class days from top chefs and fish experts, including The Scarlet's Tom Hunter, Padstow Seafood School's Mark Puckey, Fistral Beach Hotel's Ben Arthur (formerly of Fifteen Cornwall) and Annie Sibert of My Fish Kitchen.
Alongside, visitors can enjoy freshly-prepared Cornish seafood dishes to eat in or takeaway prepared by Big Pan Parties from Lanhydrock, and Newlyn-based fishermen and processors Dreckly Fish and Seafood & Eat It.
There will be plenty to keep little hands busy too, with free, fun, hands-on activities in the Starfish School, plus advice and guidance from the team behind Cornwall Wildlife Trust's newly-launched Cornwall Good Seafood Guide.
Ruth Huxley, director of Cornwall Food & Drink, said, "We know from research that Cornish seafood has become immensely popular, but it's a complex subject and many people are still mystified about what to buy and how to cook it.
"Our stand at Royal Cornwall this year is therefore a great chance for people to get to grips with seafood in a very relaxed environment, understanding how to prepare it, what varieties are native to Cornish waters, and most importantly, how crucial the fishing industry is to the Cornish community."
For master class timetables and more information, head to www.greatcornishfish.co.uk
Read more: http://www.cornishguardian.co.uk/Seafood-treat-offer-visitors-Royal-Cornwall/story-26602260-detail/story.html#ixzz3biFce9zt Follow us: @cornishguardian on Twitter | cornishguardian on Facebook
Job vacancy with Newlyn Harbour - general maintenance and vessel movement.
A general harbour duties vacancy has arisen at Newlyn Harbour.
The successful candidate will be required to work 40 hours per week, with some overtime. The main duties to include, general maintenance around the harbour and fish market and assisting the Deputy Harbour Manager in the movement of vessels within the harbour. Experience and /or interest in the fishing / maritime industry would be desirable.
If you wish to apply for this position please email your CV, together with covering letter to commissionadmin@newlynharbour.com
The closing date for applications is 12 June 2015 and only applications received by e-mail will be considered.
The successful candidate will be required to work 40 hours per week, with some overtime. The main duties to include, general maintenance around the harbour and fish market and assisting the Deputy Harbour Manager in the movement of vessels within the harbour. Experience and /or interest in the fishing / maritime industry would be desirable.
If you wish to apply for this position please email your CV, together with covering letter to commissionadmin@newlynharbour.com
The closing date for applications is 12 June 2015 and only applications received by e-mail will be considered.
Monday, 1 June 2015
Dumping of ****** sparks fight among North ****** fishing fleets
This story is the same, just the fish and seas are different - this story could just as easily have applied to cod in the North Sea! - brings to mind the dilemma of choke species and the new discards laws.
The fleet says proposals to trim the amount of halibut it catches would be damaging, while other fishermen call for tighter controls on the trawlers’ bycatch.
But federal harvest rules only allow hook-and-line fishermen — not trawlers such as the boat Hayes captains — to sell these fish.
Hook-and-line fishermen
A longline fleet with a century-long history in catching halibut with baited hooks. The fleet wants a lower limit on how much halibut trawlers can net before their season is closed, and for trawlers to do better at avoiding these fish.
To make trawlers try to avoid halibut, they are required to dump this “bycatch” overboard. They can’t even donate the fish to a food bank.
Bering trawlers
A younger fleet of about 20 vessels that focuses on sweeping up a larger volume of lower-value fish. Trawlers contend a reduction in the levels of halibut they inadvertently catch and have to discard will cut profitability. As a result, over the past decade they have jettisoned an estimated 82 million pounds of dead or dying halibut.
Seattle company has worst rate of halibut dumping
There are big differences in how much halibut is caught and discarded by different trawl operations, a Seattle Times analysis found.
The scope of those discards — during a period of concern about diminished halibut stocks — has triggered an intense fish fight that will take center stage this week as the North Pacific Fishery Management Council meets in Sitka, Alaska.
This battle plays out between two very different industry groups: a longline fleet with a century-long history in catching halibut with arrays of baited hooks, and a younger trawl fleet that focuses on sweeping up large volumes of other, lower-value fish in large nets.
The hook-and-line fleet is pushing the council to make big mandatory reductions in the total bycatch, while the trawl fishermen contend such measures could undermine the profitability of the fleet and stall a major effort to build new vessels.
One of the few areas of common ground in this fight is a shared disdain for the dumping of all this halibut, as most of the fish don’t survive.
“This is wanton waste,” said Hayes, of Edmonds, who runs the Vaerdal, a 124-foot catcher processor. “We try to save every fish that is still alive — but those that are dead, we should be able to process.”
Hook-and-line fishermen want trawlers to do a much better job of avoiding these fish, many of which are young and undersized. “It’s time for the trawl industry to do their fair share in conserving the halibut resource,” said Paul Clampitt, another Edmonds fisherman who hooks halibut with longlines. “They have to clean up their act.”
Currently, there is a fleetwide limit on how much halibut the trawl fleet can catch and dump each season before it must shut down operations and go home. The fishery council, with members drawn from Alaska, Washington and Oregon, is to decide whether to cut that halibut cap by as much as 50 percent.
The conflict has strong regional undertones.
Most of the trawlers are based in Washington, while the discards have ignited some of the strongest passions in the 49th state, where halibut helps sustain hundreds of small-boat longline fishermen in many coastal communities.
Over the past decade, the dead and dying halibut dumped by trawlers working off Alaska equals nearly 20 percent of all halibut caught off Alaska and brought to market by the hook-and-line fleet.
During those years, halibut stocks of harvest age have been on a downturn.
The International Pacific Halibut Commission, which sets catch limits, has cut commercial longline harvests off Alaska, Canada and the West Coast from more than 70 million pounds in 2005 to less than 24 million pounds last year. Alaska’s Bering Sea region has been hit with some of the biggest longliner cutbacks. And next year, if the trawl discards aren’t reduced, the Bering Sea halibut longline fishery risks getting cut back still further. That prospect has stoked plenty of anger in Alaska.
“We’re commercial fishermen, too,” said Simeon Swetzof, mayor of St. Paul, who fishes for halibut from a 32-foot boat based in his Pribilof Island community. “We live right in the middle of the Bering Sea, and it is one of the richest fisheries in the world. And for us to get shut down — it is totally not right. It’s unacceptable.”
Bering trawlers
The Bering Sea trawlers at the center of the controversy are a fleet of about 20 vessels that make their money by catching, cleaning and freezing yellowfin sole, rock sole and other species that share the sea with halibut.
Bering Sea trawl fishermen note that the halibut they waste is capped at 5.1 million pounds a year for the entire fleet. That’s a small percentage of their total harvest of more than 710 million pounds of fish, with a value that typically exceeds $320 million.
In recent years, they have been able to conduct their harvests without approaching that cap.
But they contend that lowering the halibut limit by 50% would cripple their fleet, forcing them to end their seasons long before they get their quotas of the allowed target species.
There is no consensus about how big a financial hit the trawlers would take from a reduced limit. Those uncertainties, in part, reflect different perspectives on how much trawlers could do to reduce the number of halibut they catch and dump.
To prepare for this week’s meeting, the federal fishery council hired a contractor to examine the impact of lowering the trawler cap on halibut discards. That analysis concluded that if the Bering Sea trawl fleet were required to cut halibut discards by 50%, the lost revenue would range from $37 million to nearly $70 million a year.
Trawl operators cite a much higher figure. The Ground Fish Forum, an industry group that represents most of their fleet, estimates the losses would top $136 million annually and that some vessels would stop fishing.
Already, trawl-industry officials say the fear of halibut cutbacks is slowing efforts to upgrade the aging fleet with new vessels — investments that could generate $1 billon in revenue to shipyards.
“Everybody is scared to death to go down that road, so they are stuck with 30, 40 and 50-year (old) hulls,” said Dennis Moran, president of Fishermen’s Finest, a Kirkland-based trawl company.
His company is building one new catcher-processor vessel at Dakota Creek Industries in Anacortes at a cost of more than $70 million, but it put on hold plans to build two more.
“Anyone who wants to build a new boat at this point would have to have their heads examined,” he said. Moran’s company, which operates two catcher processors, has undertaken a high-profile campaign to rally support for the bottom-trawling fleet. In April, his company delivered a petition signed by more than 23,000 people to Gov. Jay Inslee, seeking to rally support for the bottom trawlers in their efforts to stave off council actions. It’s not clear all three Washington council members will support the bottom trawlers.
Alaskans, with six of the 11 voting seats, hold the majority on the federal fishery council, and they face intense pressure to endorse a 50% halibut cut.
Due to conflicts of interest, two of the Alaskan representatives have been disqualified by the U.S. Commerce Department from voting in the Sitka meeting on the halibut proposals. But that may prompt Alaskans to delay the vote until they can reassert their majority.
“If there is any chance we might not have six votes ready and able to vote, we will postpone,” said Clem Tillion, an Alaskan who represents Aleut Native fishermen and who once served as chairman of the North Pacific Fishery Management Council.
Squeeze to continue
No matter what happens at the meeting, the trawl fleet is expected to continue to face intense pressure to reduce the numbers of halibut that end up in its nets.
A council study concluded that bottom trawlers could still do more to cut their take of halibut by shifting the timing and location of some of the trawls, as well as other measures.
Hayes, who works for Seattle-based U.S. Seafood, says his company already takes significant steps such as using “excluder” devices that hamper efficient fishing but enable more of the large halibut to escape the net before it’s drawn to the surface.
Hayes also tows his nets at slower speeds so that he doesn’t sweep up as many halibut, and quickly moves away from any spot on the sea floor that is full of halibut.
He says the toughest challenge is to keep from killing the many small halibut, which don’t get separated by the excluders. To boost their survival rates, Hayes would like to sort the halibut from the rest of the catch on his deck, rather them dump all the fish into below-deck tanks. That would enable him to rescue more halibut while they’re still alive and return them to the sea.
The rules prohibit such deck sorting, out of concern that federal observers wouldn’t be able to properly sample the catch. But experimental efforts have been permitted, and a 2013 study found halibut mortality rates on one vessel could be reduced from about 80% to around 60%.
This year, those experiments once again are under way, with additional federal observers brought on board, at the trawlers’ expense, to watchdog that effort.
“It’s definitely a conservation idea whose time has come,” Hayes said.
Full story courtesy of By Hal Bernton and Justin Mayo
Seattle Times staff reporters
The fleet says proposals to trim the amount of halibut it catches would be damaging, while other fishermen call for tighter controls on the trawlers’ bycatch.
 |
| When Skipper Bill Hayes brings up his trawl net from the bottom of the Bering Sea, he often finds halibut mixed in with the yellowfin sole and other fish he pursues with a Seattle-based trawler. |
 |
| Poached in a lemon herb sauce or seared on the grill, these firm white-fleshed fish would be fine eating. People often pay more than $15 a pound for halibut at the store. |
But federal harvest rules only allow hook-and-line fishermen — not trawlers such as the boat Hayes captains — to sell these fish.
Hook-and-line fishermen
A longline fleet with a century-long history in catching halibut with baited hooks. The fleet wants a lower limit on how much halibut trawlers can net before their season is closed, and for trawlers to do better at avoiding these fish.
To make trawlers try to avoid halibut, they are required to dump this “bycatch” overboard. They can’t even donate the fish to a food bank.
Bering trawlers
A younger fleet of about 20 vessels that focuses on sweeping up a larger volume of lower-value fish. Trawlers contend a reduction in the levels of halibut they inadvertently catch and have to discard will cut profitability. As a result, over the past decade they have jettisoned an estimated 82 million pounds of dead or dying halibut.
Seattle company has worst rate of halibut dumping
There are big differences in how much halibut is caught and discarded by different trawl operations, a Seattle Times analysis found.
The scope of those discards — during a period of concern about diminished halibut stocks — has triggered an intense fish fight that will take center stage this week as the North Pacific Fishery Management Council meets in Sitka, Alaska.
This battle plays out between two very different industry groups: a longline fleet with a century-long history in catching halibut with arrays of baited hooks, and a younger trawl fleet that focuses on sweeping up large volumes of other, lower-value fish in large nets.
The hook-and-line fleet is pushing the council to make big mandatory reductions in the total bycatch, while the trawl fishermen contend such measures could undermine the profitability of the fleet and stall a major effort to build new vessels.
One of the few areas of common ground in this fight is a shared disdain for the dumping of all this halibut, as most of the fish don’t survive.
“This is wanton waste,” said Hayes, of Edmonds, who runs the Vaerdal, a 124-foot catcher processor. “We try to save every fish that is still alive — but those that are dead, we should be able to process.”
Hook-and-line fishermen want trawlers to do a much better job of avoiding these fish, many of which are young and undersized. “It’s time for the trawl industry to do their fair share in conserving the halibut resource,” said Paul Clampitt, another Edmonds fisherman who hooks halibut with longlines. “They have to clean up their act.”
Currently, there is a fleetwide limit on how much halibut the trawl fleet can catch and dump each season before it must shut down operations and go home. The fishery council, with members drawn from Alaska, Washington and Oregon, is to decide whether to cut that halibut cap by as much as 50 percent.
The conflict has strong regional undertones.
Most of the trawlers are based in Washington, while the discards have ignited some of the strongest passions in the 49th state, where halibut helps sustain hundreds of small-boat longline fishermen in many coastal communities.
Over the past decade, the dead and dying halibut dumped by trawlers working off Alaska equals nearly 20 percent of all halibut caught off Alaska and brought to market by the hook-and-line fleet.
During those years, halibut stocks of harvest age have been on a downturn.
The International Pacific Halibut Commission, which sets catch limits, has cut commercial longline harvests off Alaska, Canada and the West Coast from more than 70 million pounds in 2005 to less than 24 million pounds last year. Alaska’s Bering Sea region has been hit with some of the biggest longliner cutbacks. And next year, if the trawl discards aren’t reduced, the Bering Sea halibut longline fishery risks getting cut back still further. That prospect has stoked plenty of anger in Alaska.
“We’re commercial fishermen, too,” said Simeon Swetzof, mayor of St. Paul, who fishes for halibut from a 32-foot boat based in his Pribilof Island community. “We live right in the middle of the Bering Sea, and it is one of the richest fisheries in the world. And for us to get shut down — it is totally not right. It’s unacceptable.”
Bering trawlers
The Bering Sea trawlers at the center of the controversy are a fleet of about 20 vessels that make their money by catching, cleaning and freezing yellowfin sole, rock sole and other species that share the sea with halibut.
Bering Sea trawl fishermen note that the halibut they waste is capped at 5.1 million pounds a year for the entire fleet. That’s a small percentage of their total harvest of more than 710 million pounds of fish, with a value that typically exceeds $320 million.
In recent years, they have been able to conduct their harvests without approaching that cap.
But they contend that lowering the halibut limit by 50% would cripple their fleet, forcing them to end their seasons long before they get their quotas of the allowed target species.
There is no consensus about how big a financial hit the trawlers would take from a reduced limit. Those uncertainties, in part, reflect different perspectives on how much trawlers could do to reduce the number of halibut they catch and dump.
To prepare for this week’s meeting, the federal fishery council hired a contractor to examine the impact of lowering the trawler cap on halibut discards. That analysis concluded that if the Bering Sea trawl fleet were required to cut halibut discards by 50%, the lost revenue would range from $37 million to nearly $70 million a year.
Trawl operators cite a much higher figure. The Ground Fish Forum, an industry group that represents most of their fleet, estimates the losses would top $136 million annually and that some vessels would stop fishing.
Already, trawl-industry officials say the fear of halibut cutbacks is slowing efforts to upgrade the aging fleet with new vessels — investments that could generate $1 billon in revenue to shipyards.
“Everybody is scared to death to go down that road, so they are stuck with 30, 40 and 50-year (old) hulls,” said Dennis Moran, president of Fishermen’s Finest, a Kirkland-based trawl company.
His company is building one new catcher-processor vessel at Dakota Creek Industries in Anacortes at a cost of more than $70 million, but it put on hold plans to build two more.
“Anyone who wants to build a new boat at this point would have to have their heads examined,” he said. Moran’s company, which operates two catcher processors, has undertaken a high-profile campaign to rally support for the bottom-trawling fleet. In April, his company delivered a petition signed by more than 23,000 people to Gov. Jay Inslee, seeking to rally support for the bottom trawlers in their efforts to stave off council actions. It’s not clear all three Washington council members will support the bottom trawlers.
Alaskans, with six of the 11 voting seats, hold the majority on the federal fishery council, and they face intense pressure to endorse a 50% halibut cut.
Due to conflicts of interest, two of the Alaskan representatives have been disqualified by the U.S. Commerce Department from voting in the Sitka meeting on the halibut proposals. But that may prompt Alaskans to delay the vote until they can reassert their majority.
“If there is any chance we might not have six votes ready and able to vote, we will postpone,” said Clem Tillion, an Alaskan who represents Aleut Native fishermen and who once served as chairman of the North Pacific Fishery Management Council.
Squeeze to continue
No matter what happens at the meeting, the trawl fleet is expected to continue to face intense pressure to reduce the numbers of halibut that end up in its nets.
A council study concluded that bottom trawlers could still do more to cut their take of halibut by shifting the timing and location of some of the trawls, as well as other measures.
Hayes, who works for Seattle-based U.S. Seafood, says his company already takes significant steps such as using “excluder” devices that hamper efficient fishing but enable more of the large halibut to escape the net before it’s drawn to the surface.
Hayes also tows his nets at slower speeds so that he doesn’t sweep up as many halibut, and quickly moves away from any spot on the sea floor that is full of halibut.
He says the toughest challenge is to keep from killing the many small halibut, which don’t get separated by the excluders. To boost their survival rates, Hayes would like to sort the halibut from the rest of the catch on his deck, rather them dump all the fish into below-deck tanks. That would enable him to rescue more halibut while they’re still alive and return them to the sea.
The rules prohibit such deck sorting, out of concern that federal observers wouldn’t be able to properly sample the catch. But experimental efforts have been permitted, and a 2013 study found halibut mortality rates on one vessel could be reduced from about 80% to around 60%.
This year, those experiments once again are under way, with additional federal observers brought on board, at the trawlers’ expense, to watchdog that effort.
“It’s definitely a conservation idea whose time has come,” Hayes said.
Full story courtesy of By Hal Bernton and Justin Mayo
Seattle Times staff reporters
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)