Fresh fish grace Tuesday's market floor - #openforbusiness

More buyers than boxes...

and at £5.80 per kilo for small codling only the buyers with bulging pockets were likely to send any fish away to their customers this morning...

even the solitary shark made good money on a market very much starved of fish since Christmas...

stacked two high, the results of a day's fishing in the Bay for the netter Ajax...

where the bulk of fish were good sized pollack caught moving across the ground...

with yet more gales forecast and another spring tide on it way none of the local businesses lining the Strand in Newlyn are taking any chances.

"Why the UK government should act on bottom trawling" or Why should the UK Government act on bottom trawling?

Your thoughts?

In a recent article, The Guardian's Robin McKie explains that bottom trawling, if allowed to continue unchecked, could leave the seas empty in the next 150 years.

Bottom trawling is the practice of dragging heavy nets along the seabed in order to catch the fish that thrive there, including cod and haddock. And, as a result of this - as proved by evidence presented in a report from the the University of York - fish stocks have decreased dramatically. "Twenty years ago, we used to get 600 or 700 a head of fish a day," says B Simpson, a line-fisherman who worked off Spurn Point, Grimsby. "Now they cannot get above 20 head, or three or four score at the outside."

But the impact does not stop there; there has also been considerable damage to the seabed, which not only triggers a further depletion of fish stocks but also wrecks reefs, sponges and shellfish, without giving any chance for recuperation.

Here is Callum Roberts giving his take on the subject:

 

We are then left, argues Callum Roberts - author of Ocean of Life - in a state where there is nothing left that is worth catching. However, the European Commission has decided that Britain can not afford to block bottom trawling, declaring, "unrestricted freedom of fishing should be permitted." And furthermore, as McKie explains, the UK government doesn't seem to be doing enough.

After arranging a consultation on the topic, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) only agreed to consult on 31 of the 127 proposed Marine Protection Zones - a number which was later reduced to 27. Furthermore, they also dropped the idea of reference areas which would have provided the opportunity to demonstrate the state of marine features when left alone while also providing a control site from which to measure the impact of human activities in other marine areas.
However, bottom trawling does not happen everywhere around the UK. Because of pressure being applied by Non-Governmental Organisations, such as the Marine Conservation Society (MSC), the practice has been banned is some Marine Protected Areas including one in Cornwall. "This point is backed by Roberts," says McKie, quoting, "there is little to be cheerful about when it comes to our marine environment, which makes recent successes with those areas protected by EU law – although limited in extent – all the more pleasing."

Posted by Grace Philip on February 11, 2014 at 11:26am in News and Blogs 

This was a recent post on the FishNet site - created by the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) as part of its work on fisheries.

“Overfished” or “Depleted?” by Nils E. Stolpe

“What’s in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet.” (William Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet, Act II, Scene II)

Contrary to what might have been true when Shakespeare had Juliet speak those words in the 1590s, how things are called is far from meaningless today. This is particularly so due to the increasingly pervasive and influential social media driven by sound bite journalism, text messages maxing out at 255 characters and Tweets at 140. When so much of contemporary communication and contemporary thought is dependent on so few words, those words, their exact meaning and their precise use have become critically important.

Thus it was with great relief that I saw that one of the amendments to the Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson Act) offered by House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Doc Hastings deals with one of the most prejudicial examples of misnaming that has penalized commercial and recreational fishermen and our fish stocks for years.

This proposed amendment and a handful of others are contained in the draft Strengthening Fishing Communities and Increasing Flexibility in Fisheries Management Act (available at http://naturalresources.house.gov/magnusonstevens/). This draft legislation addresses a number of the concerns that independent fishermen – both recreational and commercial – and the businesses that depend on them have had since the original intent of the Magnuson Act has been so severely distorted by a handful of foundations, the powerful agenda-driven ENGOs that they support and the fishing organizations that have been co-opted by them.

In subsequent blogs I will be addressing some of the other draft changes.

Currently the Magnuson Act defines any stock of fish that is not at a high enough level to produce the maximum sustainable yield (msy) as being “overfished.” This is regardless of whether it is fishing that has reduced the stock to this level, or of whether cutting back on or curtailing fishing will return that stock to a “non-overfished” condition.

This law is without question the most important piece of legislation that deals with domestic fisheries management. Not only is it important because it controls the management of virtually all of the fisheries in our federal waters; it also has an overwhelming influence on the management and the managers of the fisheries in state waters (generally within 3 miles of the coast). Considering the pervasive influence of the Magnuson Act on the management of our domestic fisheries, to suggest that it’s equating “not enough fish” to “overfished” contributes to a blame-it-all-on-fishing mindset is a monumental understatement. Obviously this is an ongoing public relations nightmare for the domestic fishing industry (and an effective weapon for anti-fishing individuals and organizations). But more than that, the almost completely fishing-centric focus on marine resource management that it is responsible for has had an undue influence on federal fisheries policy for most of two decades.

Not enough fish? No matter what the underlying reason, it must be the fault of the fishermen because that fishery is classified as “overfished.” There’s no need to look any farther than that. What a gift to the anti-fishing activists.

At this point, and without Congressman Hastings’ much needed amendment, neither pollution, degraded habitat, oil well blow outs, overzealous application of Corexit, ocean temperature shifts, low egg/larval/fingerling survival nor any other factors count because the fishery is “overfished.” Obviously fishing must be to blame and just as obviously cutting back on fishing--making the fishermen who must be responsible for the “overfishing” pay for the environmental affronts of others--is the only way to restore the overfished stocks. Just as obviously the activists aren’t the only ones who benefit from this word play.

The tragic situation that the New England groundfish stocks, the New England groundfishermen, the New England fishing communities and a bunch of New England seafood lovers are facing is about as good (difficult as it is for me to use “good” to refer to anything having to do with the current groundfish debacle) an example of how off-target our fishing-centric understanding of “not enough fish” can be. In the groundfish fishery fishing effort has been cut back significantly and repeatedly and the stocks have yet to make a comeback.

Quite simply and accurately, Chairman Hastings’ draft legislation substitutes “depleted” for “overfished” wherever it appears throughout the Magnuson Act.

To what benefit? Most simply, this will take the management focus off fishing where overfishing isn’t a factor, encourage the consideration of other factors in determining why there aren’t enough fish in a particular stock and encourage the adoption when appropriate--when fishing isn’t to blame--of measures other than reducing fishing to return a stock to levels that will produce the maximum sustainable yield.

What’s the downside? If you’re not on a career track that depends on demonizing fishermen and/or fishing or if you aren’t responsible for any of the many other factors that negatively affect our fisheries, there isn’t one. Overfishing will be as unacceptable with this change as it is without it, but it will provide our fisheries managers while attempting to restore stocks to the MSY level the wherewithal to consider and, we should all hope, deal with other negative factors as well.

It’s going to be interesting to examine the “reasons” that the antis come up with for opposing this long overdue and entirely justified change.

• Note that the first hearing by Congressman Hastings on his proposed amendments to Magnuson was held on February 4. The video of the hearing and the witness testimony are available at http://naturalresources.house.gov/calendar/eventsingle.aspx?EventID=367382.

On a different subject, Sea to Table’s Weekly Fish Report dated January 26, 2014 makes the “charge” that “due to their delicate nature and short shelf life, virtually all scallops are treated with sodium tripolyphosphate which acts as a preservative as well as a water retention agent causing each scallop to weigh more.” This is a piece promoting Sea to Table scallops and the foregoing is meant to apply to virtually all scallops but theirs, of course.

The fact is that a large proportion of East coast sea scallops are sold “dry” (out of the shell, into a seawater rinse to remove sand and shell residue, into a muslin bag, packed in ice, on to the dock then off to market. With New Jersey producing a fifth of all of the sea scallops landed on the East coast, industry insiders estimate that this is how at least half of the state’s sea scallop production is sold. While the folks at From Sea to Table or any other domestic seafood dealer should rightfully tout the quality of the products they offer, that should be based on the most accurate information available.

“Overfished” or “Depleted?” Nils E. Stolpe / December 31, 2013

This was originally posted on the Fishosophy blog, which is jointly hosted on the American Fisheries Society (http://www.fisheries.org) and the American Institute of Fishery Research Biologists (http://www.aifrb.org) websites. The contents of the blog do not necessarily represent the views of the other Fishosophy bloggers, either organization or their leadership.

AIS tracks the fishing vessel Ajax in Mount's Bay

While the first sight of the AIS tracks might be confusing to the casual observer...

 the highlighted version shows where the three 'tiers' of nets that the Ajax has shot are in the Bay. With only a 36 hour lull in the weather the boat was forced to fish in home waters rather than norh west or west of the Scillies - her normal operational grounds. The boat hauls the nets into the wind so as to keep the boat 'on the gear' - the skipper also has to take note of the direction of the tide flowing as well.

Are #ukstorms worse today? - it would seem not - a review of Penzance's Great Ash Wednesday Storm

Although Penzance's iconic promenade has suffered in the recent storms the damage is nothing in comparison to the damage inflicted during the great Ash Wednesday storm of 1962...

when the back streets - here is Cornwall Terrace in front of the Bath Inn - were badly flooded...

along with the now defunct garage at Tolcarne Motors...

and the Mount's Bay Inn, more often referred to by anyone in Newlyn as the Red Light which hung outside the front door...

like recent storm the Lugger Inn (known as the Marine (or cockroach) Hotel in the 1960s) suffered damage
from seas  crashing over the prom...

which was damaged far more heavily than in this last series of storms...

with complete section of the sea wall destroyed including the railings...

 which were washed back into the sea...

like here in front of the Queens...

the damage wasn't just restricted to the Penzance end, here the entire sea wall protecting the Tolcarne car park was destroyed with the pounding seas forcing huge granite stones against the wall of Peake's the Funeral Directors and Shipwrights...

and blasting a hole in the sea wall on Newlyn Green.

Shooting in the Bay

With the smallest of weather windows and the biggest of ground seas the Ajax has shot a few tiers of nets in the Bay. Leaving the nets 'soak' overnight they plan to steam from Newlyn around 7am to haul the gear before the next weather system hits Cornwall.

Steaming into the weather - the huge distances covered by pelagic boatsfishing off Ireland and landing their fish to Norway

Photo courtesy of Steve Ellwood.

  The 65m Banff registered pelagic boat Resolute...

left Egursund in Norway at 2.30pm on Friday the 7th to begin the long steam...

across the North Sea and through the Pentlandite Firth...

down the west coast of Scotland and Ireland to join the huge fleet of mackerel boats working off Ireland - like all the pelagic boats she will have had to endure some pretty harsh conditions on the way steaming head on into the latest inbound storm to cross the Atlantic.