='"loading" + data:blog.mobileClass'>

Thursday 21 November 2013

Leviathan - a unique fishing film coming to a cinema near you!

Mixing it with the gulls - HD GoPro cameras went where no cameraman dare


Leviathan is an extraordinary collision of genres: an art film made by a pair of British and French anthropologists that works as a stupendous cinematic spectacle. Lucien Castaing-Taylor and Verena Paravel – founders of Harvard's radically interdisciplinary Sensory Ethnography Lab – set out to make a film based in New Bedford, the "whaling city" of New England and the historic background for Herman Melville's 1851 novel Moby-Dick. But they then became increasingly fascinated by the city's contemporary status as a fishing port.




Sailing on an 80ft-foot "dragger", FV Athena, to the Grand Banks fishing grounds of the open Atlantic, Castaing-Taylor and Paravel equipped themselves and the crew with miniature GoPro cameras – new HD technology that has become beloved of documentary film-makers. The result, a dialogue-free 90-minute tumult of long takes and jump-cut editing, throws the viewer into a nausea-making, overturned world so vivid that it's hard to believe its scenes are real and not a clever CGI construction.



With the fish-eye cameras strapped to their heads, the film-makers and crew recorded the raging midnight seas from which are hauled the fish and scallops that will end up on china plates and linen tablecloths in smart restaurants. Remorselessly, they expose every aspect of this visceral business – often conducted in the dark, out of sight of land, on trips lasting up to 18 days. It is a weird otherworld, filled with bug-eyed fish slathering over the decks, clanking rusty chains and hooded figures like medieval torturers, all perpetually doused by the rising Atlantic.

Shrieking gulls plunge up from the dawn-slashed sky in vertiginous, inverted scenes as the cameras tumble upside-down. Starfish float beneath the surface like coral-coloured confetti. On deck, scarred, tattooed men eviscerate fish dragged up from the depths. In one shocking sequence, a skate dangles from a chain as its wings, the only edible parts, are excised – a scene not far from the notorious trade in definned sharks. Meanwhile, an indeterminate heavy-metal track grinds out from a radio, sounding more like the knell of an aquatic apocalypse.

These saturated, sublime images bear little comparison to any other film; rather, they evoke the work of artists such as Winslow Homer and JMW Turner. In fact, by attaching 21st-century cameras to themselves and the crew of the Athena, the directors were re-enacting Turner's legendary feat, when he had his body lashed to the mast of a Harwich boat for four hours to experience a storm at sea face-to-face and thus render it in oil. Saturated and sublime … The Herring Net, 1885, by Winslow Homer. Photograph: De Agostini/Getty Indeed, Turner was a major influence on Melville: Chapter 3 of Moby-Dick, set in a New Bedford inn, opens with a description of a "boggy, soggy, squitchy" painting, "enough to drive a nervous man distracted" – clearly an echo of Turner's whaling scenes, which Melville had seen on his visit to London in 1849, just before writing his book. In turn, the same watery themes run through the current Aquatopia show at Tate St Ives, which is showing Turner's fishy watercolours and his monumental Sunrise with Sea Monsters.

But above all, the brute force of Leviathan is itself a reflection – or perhaps a refraction – of modern-day New Bedford, a city with which I've become familiar on my own work in New England. New Bedford's whaling heyday came in the first half of the 19th century, when the slaughter of thousands of cetaceans was undertaken on voyages lasting up to five years, mired in whale oil, blubber and blood, with men returning sometimes owing money to their masters. Paradoxically, the trade was largely run by peace-loving Quakers (who also gave refuge to runaway slaves – New Bedford was an important stop on the Underground Railroad that allowed many slaves fleeing the South to escape).

The contrast between their placid faith and the bloody butchery which sustained them was just one of the tensions that coursed through this place and its conflicted relationship to the sea. The walls of the local Seamen's Bethel, a timber-framed chapel high overlooking New Bedford's harbour, are still mortared with memorials to men who died at sea – both then, and now, as mirrored by the on-screen "memorial" to lost New Bedford vessels at the end of Castaing-Taylor and Paravel's film, testament to the fact that the crew of Athena deal daily with a similar fate.

Like Moby-Dick, Leviathan reflects an industrial reality more than a maritime romance. Just as Ahab's ship was crewed from around the world, so New Bedford's whaling ships brought Azoreans and Portuguese, black Cape Verdeans and others to its port; amazingly, 64% of the population of the eastern seaboard of Massachusetts have Azorean or Portuguese blood. But as whaling declined, fishing took over – an equally deadly occupation, suffering the highest fatalities of any industry in the US.


Despite concerns over diminishing stocks (Leviathan's tip to this ecological concern is a cast list that includes the Latin binomials of every non-human species seen in the film, from Gadus morhua, cod, to Puffinus gravis, the greater shearwater), New Bedford remains the leading US fishing port, with more than three hundred boats landing $300m (£186m) worth of fish and scallops a year. Its cultural mix continues – half its fishermen were born outside the US – and the wharves are still lined with ranks of rusty vessels. This place still has a tough reputation as a maritime version of the Wild West: hard-bitten men I know who have worked there testify to high drug use and arbitary violence in and around the port. It's no coincidence that the 1988 film The Accused, in which the young female character played by Jodie Foster is raped on a billiard table, was set in New Bedford.

In contrast, the historic district of the city – block after block of extravagant mansions built by whaling captains, "harpooned and dragged up hither from the bottom of the sea" as Melville wrote – has been deemed a National Historical Park. Yet there is little gentrification here. The sense of a working place is explicit, tangible.

And just as you can smell the diesel, the salt water, and the fish guts in Leviathan, so the film's astoundingly kinetic, utterly physical aesthetic reflects this inheritance, one that turned an "academic" exercise into a physical one. "We started off intending to make a film about the sea and fishing, in which one would never see the sea, or any fishing," Castaing-Taylor and Paravel told me. "But once we started going out to the Grand Banks, landlubbing life, even in New Bedford, seemed too familiar, too pat, too predictable. Finally, we decided to jettison land altogether."

That was easier said than done. Although both directors had spent time at sea before, "we hadn't expected Lucien to get so violently sea-sick, more or less knocked out for the first 24 to 48 hours of every voyage". Even then, the anti-emetics caused Castaing-Taylor to see double – which might account for the nightmarish quality of the film. Paravel also damaged her back, necessitating an emergency visit to the hospital.

During shooting, the film-makers kept the same punishing shifts as the boat crew, working 20 out of 24 hours. "One of us often had to tie themselves to the boat, then hold on to to the other, to stabilise the camera and/or stop them falling overboard." They had to avoid being submerged by nets full of fish, crustacean, mud and rocks. "As greenhorns, we also had to take more care than the fishermen not to be hit on the head by flying winches and chains."

All the while, they were reading Moby-Dick, "screaming it out loud at each other, by turns in French and English, on the bow, on the way back into port". Castaing-Taylor and Paravel felt licenced by the book's "universality, monumentalism and unruliness, its thematisation of brutality and violence, between men but especially between humanity and the sea."

Above all, it was the chaotic arrangement of the book – which seems to reflect Melville's madness as much as that of Captain Ahab – that infused their work. The result is a much more than an anthropological exercise. It is an exposition of blood, salt and sweat, the record of a deadly industry carried out on our behalf, far beyond our cosy, everyday lives. Watching it is as near as you will get to the experience itself. I recommend sea-sickness pills – or at least a good tot of bourbon.

• Philip Hoare's books, Leviathan and The Sea Inside, are published by Fourth Estate (philiphoare.co.uk). He will be in conversation with Lucien Castaing-Taylor and Verena Paravel at a screening of Leviathan at Tate Modern, London, on 22 November.

For details of further screenings of Leviathan visit the film's website. • Top 10 documentaries • The eco-documentary: an endangered species? • Feature: do protest films change anything?

• This article was amended on Monday 18 November 2013. Film-maker Lucien Castaing-Taylor is British, not American as we said above. This has been corrected.

England names 27 new marine conservation zones - down from 127!



Twenty-seven new marine conservation zones (MCZs) will be created in English seas on Thursday to protect seahorses, coral reefs, oyster beds and other marine life. But the number is four less than ministers proposed and just one-fifth of the 127 zones recommended by the government's own consultation.
 
The seas around England are some of richest marine environments in the world, with dense forests of seaweed, many fish and crustacean species and schools of dolphins, but dredging and bottom-trawling for fish, prawns and aggregates have devastated large areas.
 
"We very much see the new MCZs as the beginning and not an end," said environment minister George Eustice, who said consultation on two more tranches of MCZs would start in 2015. He added: "It is important to remember that MCZs are only one part of the jigsaw. Over 500 marine protected areas already exist around the UK."
 
The 27 zones cover 9,700 kilometres squared (km2) from the Aln estuary in the north-east to Beachy Head and Chesil Beach in the south and Padstow Bay and the Scilly Isles in the south-west. Together with the 30,000km2 already protected, 9% of all UK waters and one-quarter of inshore waters now have some form of protection – though critics have called the existing protected areas "paper parks" that do not stop the most damaging practices.
 
Professor Callum Roberts, a marine expert at the University of York who led 86 marine scientists in condemning the government in April for reneging on the 127 MCZs recommended by an earlier £8m consultation, said: "The 27 is far, far away from where we need to be."
 
Ministers have argued that the economic cost to fishing and ports of some proposed zones would be too great, but Roberts was blunt: "It's bollocks. These MCZs will not put fishermen out of jobs: they will protect them in the long run."
 
Roberts said the possibility of more MCZs in future provided an opportunity: "If science is put at the helm it will be worth waiting for."
 
Joan Edwards, the Wildlife Trusts' head of living seas, welcomed the news: "Marine protection is an issue which matters to anyone who has ever spent happy afternoons exploring rock pools or been enchanted by chance encounters with dolphins, whales or one of the many other captivating species we enjoy in our waters."
 
But she said the completion of an "ecologically coherent network of marine-protected areas was desperately needed", particularly to ensure species with large ranges like basking sharks and sea birds were protected.
 
Dr Jean-Luc Solandt, biodiversity policy officer at the Marine Conservation Society, said the current way of creating MCZs was too complex and costly, as each part of each zone had to be assessed. "Protecting whole zones is much more simple and visionary as it allows larger areas of seabed to actually recover. That is what our sites need – actual recovery."
 
Barry Gardiner, Labour's environment minister, said: "Once again we see this government's failure to implement proper science. The scientific purpose was to create an ecologically coherent and resilient network of 127 sites and 65 reference areas that would safeguard and enhance the biodiversity of our marine heritage. The government is not only 100 sites light but predictably it has failed to specify how the inshore fisheries conservation authorities are going to be resourced to monitor, manage and enforce this new statutory obligation."
 
On Monday, 41 UK conservation groups issued a report stating that just four of the 25 nature and wildlife commitments made by the government were progressing well. It said the ministers were failing on the pledge to better protect the marine environment.

Story courtesy of the Guardian.

Fisherman says axing helicopters is "absolutely crazy"

An accident aboard a Westcountry trawler in which a crew member had his thumb severed proves the Government's decision to axe emergency helicopter cover is "absolutely crazy", fishermen have said. Aaron Mazs was injured as the Spanish Eyes III hauled its nets ten miles off Lyme Regis on Thursday morning.​
 
Skipper Luke Wason immediately alerted coastguards and the Portland helicopter, which is being axed in 2017, was on scene in ten minutes. Mr Mazs, 38, was flown to Salisbury District Hospital where surgeons attempted to re-attach his severed thumb. Mr Wason praised the response of coastguards and the helicopter crew but said it highlighted the future plight of fishermen who found themselves in distress.
 
"I called the coastguards about 15 seconds after the accident," 34-year-old Mr Wason said. "The helicopter was with us about ten minutes later.  "In future though it could have been half an hour away or more which is a big difference. The helicopter at Portland is going and it doesn't seem as though we can do anything about it. It is a real shame and it is putting peoples' lives at risk."

The Government confirmed earlier this year that Newquay will be the sole search-and-rescue helicopter base on the Westcountry coast after it awarded the contract to US-headquartered Bristow Helicopters.

The privatisation deal ends 70 years of a service run by the RAF and Royal Navy squadrons, with helicopters due to be withdrawn from RNAS Culdrose, near Helston, Cornwall, and RMB Chivenor near Braunton, North Devon.

The civilian search-and-rescue helicopter based at Portland, Dorset, has also been ditched. From 2017, the nearest base on the south coast will be Lee-on-Solent in Hampshire.
Mr Wason's father Paul, who co-owns the trawler, said their arguments for keeping the base at Portland had "fallen on deaf ears".

"When an accident happens, especially something like this morning, it just highlights the fact that we need to helicopter to be kept in Portland," the 67-year-old, ho has been fishing for more than 50 years, said. "Speed is of the essence and if you have got to wait 35 minutes for a helicopter from Lee-on-Solent, compared to 10 minutes from Portland, then you are talking about the difference between life and death. "It all comes down to money and what the Government is doing is putting a price on peoples' lives. It is absolutely crazy. "While you can never be complacent as a fisherman, you do feel safer knowing help is close at hand if you need it."

The Department for Transport said the new contract helicopters will be able to reach a larger area of the UK within one hour of take-off than is currently possible. Ten bases, which will be operated 24-hours a day, are being located near areas of high incident rates. Based on historic incident data, it is estimated there will be an overall improvement in flying times to incidents from 23 to 19 minutes.
The handover, the result of Labour's push for privatisation in 2006, will begin in 2015 and be fully up-and-running in 2017.


Read more: http://www.thisiscornwall.co.uk/Fishermen-axeing-rescue-helicopters-crazy/story-20102505-detail/story.html#ixzz2lH0nh23y

Follow us: @thisiscornwall on Twitter | thisiscornwall on Facebook

Wednesday 20 November 2013

Newlyn fish discards could harm smaller vessels - viability report from UEA





EU rules to end fish discards could penalise smaller fleets in Cornwall, it has been claimed.
Laws to end the throwing of unwanted fish overboard were agreed this year after a campaign led by celebrity chef Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall.
The University of East Anglia said smaller fishing vessels were "at risk of having their fishing curtailed".
Cornish fish producers said the policy had not been thought through. Policy supporters said it would end waste.
'Sound bite' claim
The new rules will be gradually phased in for Newlyn from 2016.
Supporters said basing quotas on the amount caught rather than what was landed would end waste.
However, critics said it would hurt those fishing in areas with lots of different species.
Professor Alistair Grant, who supervised the university study, said: "Smaller fishermen don't have the technology or the range to be able to catch exactly what they want to catch.
"They tend to have relatively high discard rates so they will be the ones most at risk of having their fishing curtailed."
Paul Trebilcock, chief executive of the Cornish Fish Producers Organisation, said: "The discard ban was a sound bite from a celebrity chef which has led to a policy that has not been thought through.
"We don't yet know what the impact will be for sustainability and what will happen to fishing businesses in Cornwall. It's more questions than answers at this stage."
'Can be done'
Hugh Fearnley Whittingstall said in a statement that ending discards was much more than a sound bite, and that the rules had been reformed not just to end waste but to set quotas in line with scientific advice.
He added that although changes would require a lot of effort, there were already boats around the UK showing that by changing fishing gear and fishing in the right places it could be done.
Camborne and Redruth Conservative MP George Eustice, who is Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for farming, food and marine environment, said EU grants were available to help fishermen pay for new equipment.
He said: "There are funds in place to do new research to develop ever-better new net gear, but also to support fishermen in buying that gear."
South West Conservative MEP Julie Girling said beam trawlers based in Brixham in neighbouring Devon had "managed to reduce discards to negligible levels".

Story courtesy of BBC Cornwall and Radio Cornwall' breakfats show with James Churchfieldl

Fish discard ban 'could harm smaller Cornish fishing vessels'

Beasts with little backbone, the cephalapods rule!


Octopi...



and plastic wrapped squid...



just some of the beasts on offer this morning...



where blue seems to be the in colour...


as Lionel holds forth...


on the biggest market in Cornwall...


caught red-handed trying to leg it!








Tuesday 19 November 2013

"Does banning discards in an otter trawler fishery create incentives for more selective fishing?" - Might be worth a read!


Does banning discards in an otter trawler fishery create incentives for more selective fishing?

Fisheries Research, Volume null, Issue null, Page null
Harriet M. Condie, Alastair Grant, Thomas L. Catchpole



Abstract:
Reforms of the European Union Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) will implement an EU wide ban on discarding phased in from 2015, requiring the landing of unwanted small and unmarketable fish. 


The Commission argues that this will create strong incentives for more selective fishing practices; however, there is little information to allow us to predict likely changes in fishing behaviour. Using detailed historic observer and logbook data from English North Sea otter trawlers and information on fish prices and landing costs, we examine the potential impact of a discard ban combined with either effort controls or catch quotas on the landings of an average trip. We calculate fishing incomes based on the assumption that existing fishing behaviour and catch compositions are maintained and compare this with incomes calculated on the assumption that all unwanted catch can be avoided. The difference provides an estimate of the maximum possible financial incentive for fishers to adopt more selective fishing practices. 


The calculations suggest that a discard ban in isolation will generate little economic incentive to operate more selectively. When combined with effort controls, a reduction in fishing effort may result in a proportional reduction in unwanted catches, but an incentive to actively avoid this catch is unlikely to be generated. Catch quotas would generate much stronger economic incentives, but only for the avoidance of the five quota species. So, contrary to the aims of the reformed CFP, a discard ban may not result in a dramatic reduction in unmarketable catches of all species. 


For more information click here.


Keywords Discards; Discard ban; Common Fisheries Policy reform; Catch quotas; Selective fishing