Tuesday's archive photo - bound away to Rockall

An uncomfortable 52 hour steam from Fleetwood out to Rockall - rolling all the way in a fresh south westerly breeze - Dumnonia - 1989.

Greenpeace - busted?

Not entirely dedicated to fishing communities but just as relevant - Magnus Gudmundsson , an Icelandic filmaker and journalist has taken the fight direct to Greenpeace to expose their tactics - some of which, like the infamous seal hunting videos - have since been shown to be staged - those same videos brought about the end of entire remote communities who once relied on selling seal skins!

Familiar story?

This story is of of a rally held by New England fishermen in Boston yesterday in protest at huge cuts in cod quotas - despite the evidence on the fishing grounds to the contrary - now where have we heard this before?!

Maybe just substitute a few words!

New England North Sea fishermen and their political allies rallied at a Boston  UK fish pier Monday to make an urgent call for relief from deep and imminent cuts to their catch limits.

As of Wednesday’s start of the 2013 fishing year, fishermen who chase bottom-dwelling groundfish — such as cod and flounder — will absorb a series of cuts that regulators acknowledge will be devastating, and fishermen say will ruin them.

The worst of the reductions is a year-to-year cut of 77 percent in cod in the Gulf of Maine while the catch limit for cod on Georges Bank will be cut 61 percent. Regulators have said the cuts are mandated under the nation’s fishing law because key stocks are in bad shape and recovering too slowly.

But fishermen question the science behind the cuts, saying it’s too unreliable to use as a basis to bury the centuries-old industry. They note that they’ve fished within the limits recommended by science for a decade, and things have only gotten worse.

Gloucester fisherman Vito Giacalone said ‘‘years of sacrifice, forced reinvestment and compliance with every catch limit should not be rewarded with bankruptcy and apathy.’’

‘‘By continuing to knowingly sacrifice fishermen and their shore side support businesses while we wait for science to catch up to the realities of this ever-changing ecosystem, we are destroying the future of our fisheries,’’ said Giacalone, policy director of the Northeast Seafood Coalition, who was joined by scores of other fishermen at the rally.

U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren called for federal disaster relief, arguing Washington should be as quick to respond to a disaster for fishermen as it is to respond to disasters that strike farmers.

‘‘A disaster is entitled to relief, and that’s true whether we’re talking about crops or whether we’re taking about fish,’’ Warren said. ‘‘Washington rushes in to help our farmers. Washington needs to rush in to help our fishermen.’’

Among the lawmakers joining Warren was fellow Democrat, interim U.S. Sen. William ‘‘Mo’’ Cowan, and members of the state’s all-Democratic U.S. House delegation, including U.S. Rep. John Tierney and U.S. Rep. William Keating.

Besides disaster relief, fishermen and their political allies are pushing NOAA to extend an emergency interim measure enacted last year, which would significantly reduce the size of some of this year’s cuts.

But the Northeast’s top regulator, John Bullard, has said extending the emergency measure is not only illegal, but also ill-advised because fish stocks are in such poor shape that tough measures are needed for them to rebound.

He adds the science indicating stocks are struggling is backed by the 2012 catch, which was significantly down on several species around New England.

Since announcing the cuts, NOAA has pushed ways to ease the hit on fishermen, such as allowing them to carry over a portion of their uncaught 2012 quota or allowing them to catch more of the healthier fish stocks.

‘‘We are continuing to work with fishermen, federal agencies and others with an interest in preserving this industry to identify other ways to help fishermen find a bridge while stocks rebuild,’’ said Bullard, who attended the rally.

Story courtesy of the Boston Globe

Associated Press writer Jay Lindsay contributed to this report.

How to Blue Lobby

Ten Steps to a Successful Congressional Lobby Visit

FROM: BLUE FRONTIER CAMPAIGN

One of the most effective ways to influence a Senator or Representative is lobbying—meeting personally with the Member and/or his or her staff directly and making your case for a particular policy reform. A lobby visit may be scheduled in the Member’s Washington, D.C. office or at one of his/her local offices in the state (for Senators) or District (for Representatives).

The ultimate goal to develop and strengthen your relationship with the Member, so that he/she consistently delivers on your issues – in this case protecting and restoring America’s Blue Frontier.

Before the lobby visit

1. Prepare for the meeting

Successful lobby visits aren’t born, they’re made—and preparation is the essential midwife, er…prep chef. Indeed, you almost can’t over prepare; the more you plan and practice, the better you will carry out and respond to the unexpected during the visit itself.

Your group must have at least one planning session, preferably in person but at least by phone. In the session(s), you should

• Decide on the policy issues to address during the visit. Don’t try to cover more than a couple of policy issues on one visit—you risk losing focus and losing impact. You are better off scheduling more than one visit than trying to cover too much at once. Make sure every attendee is on board with the focus of the meeting.

• Assign someone to schedule the meeting. The person responsible for scheduling the meeting must make sure the group will be meeting with the right staff person, if the meeting is not with the Member. For help in determining whether you have scheduled an appointment with the appropriate Congressional staffer (or need to ask additional staff people to attend the meeting), you may want to contact DC-based staff of national Blue organizations.

• Get hold of an updated Congressional Directory. These small books give you lots of additional useful information on how to contact your Member, what committees he or she sit on and who some of their key staffers are.

• Don’t hesitate to call on others for help and information. You may be able to get useful intelligence on the Member and his/staff from others who have met on similar issues recently—other local non-profits, members of participants’ Boards of Directors, etc. National organizations similarly may have useful information to offer. Remember- knowledge is power.

2. Remember, this is your meeting— assign and practice different roles beforehand.

You should try to stage a dry run/rehearsal before the lobby visit. The following are roles that the group should consider assigning and practicing (if the group is small, some members may need to fulfill more than one function).

CHAIR

It is critical that somebody be put in charge of making sure the meeting runs as smoothly as possible. You may wish to consider having the person who is most knowledgeable about the policy issue(s) you will be discussing, or has a pre-existing relationship with the Member’s office (if someone does), serve as Chair.

Among the functions of the Chair are to:

• Open the meeting—the Chair should briefly introduce the topic and provide an opportunity for other participants to introduce themselves. If the group is too large to permit individual introductions, then the Chair should make an agreed upon collective introduction.

• Orchestrate the meeting—the group should consider having the Chair call upon people to make certain points, respond to Member/staff questions, give handouts, tell their stories, etc.

• Maintain pace—the Chair should ensure that the meeting stays on schedule. (Helpful Hint: if more than fifteen minutes has elapsed OR half of the time the Member/staffer has told you he has allotted for the meeting– whichever is less—and the group has not identified its specific demand, you should move the meeting along.

• Hold the Member/staffer accountable and nail down next steps – the Chair should be responsible for obtaining a response to the group’s demand(s) and clarify next steps following the meeting (e.g., will staffer contact Chair with a response, will a follow-up meeting be scheduled, etc.)

Handout person

The Chair may choose to handle this role, namely, organizing and handing to the Member/staffer any handouts the group has. (Helpful Hint: Members themselves are much less likely to focus on written handouts than their staff, so consider limiting the number of such documents you distribute in meetings with Representatives/Senators– important handouts can always be sent in follow up communications to staffers.)

Note-taker/Scribe

Somebody should be asked to take careful notes of what was said, especially questions raised and commitments made by the Member/staffer. After the lobby visit, the group should conduct a debriefing/follow-up meeting and these notes will be invaluable.

Questioners and responders

The group may wish to assign individual participants to ask the Member/staffer specific questions and/or to prepare responses to hard questions you anticipate the Member/staffer raising around your issue(s).

Storytellers

The most compelling tactic for making your case for a policy reform is to weave it into real-life stories about the successes of ocean and coastal restoration. Your group may wish to have some or all of the following stakeholders tell about how a plan or particular program you are discussing with the Member/staffer, works from the perspective of:

• Ocean user (recreational and/or livelihood)

• Coastal Resident (particularly long-term resident who has seen changes)

• Local ocean-dependent business person

• Local/state government officials.

During the Lobby Visit

3. Identify yourself and any influential connections you have to the Member.

Namedropping isn’t usually considered polite, but it’s a virtue on a lobby visit.

Specifically, your group should—especially on an initial visit to a Member– make his or her staff aware of any personal connections you have collectively or as individual organizations/people. This can help to credential your group even before you move on to the substance of the meeting.

Helpful Hint: A good time to do this is during introductions. As individuals introduce themselves and their organizations at the start of the lobby visit, they should be sure to mention friends, relatives, or colleagues (e.g., members of your Boards of Directors) they may have in common with the Member or his/her staff. Many times the legislative process is facilitated through such informal connections. Also, participants should be sure to mention briefly any other issues on which they may have worked with the Member/staff (and be sure to thank the Member/staff if the office took action on that issue—Members and their staff are people too; they’ll be more likely to respond to this request for help if they’re praised for past good works).

4. Be specific about what you would like your Member to do.

Know your demands before you walk in the door—if you can’t answer the question “what are the concrete actions or actions we want the Member/staffer to take?,” then you won’t get what you want out of the lobby visit.

Helpful Hint: If you are unsure of the Member’s likelihood of supporting your position, you may want to have at your fingertips a range of demands reflecting progressively decreasing levels of commitment—e.g., from introducing or co-sponsoring a piece of ocean legislation, writing a letter to Committee leadership, initiating staff-to-staff contact with another important Member on your issue, etc. Plan ahead of time whether, if your group’s top-line receives a lukewarm or evasive response, do you want to make a lesser request in the hopes of getting a concrete “yes.” This is a matter of judgment—if you think your follow-up to the visit will persuade the target to grant your top-line request, then don’t compromise.

5. State your views clearly.

Here’s a rule of thumb: The more you practice your assigned roles, the simpler your pitch should get.

Always remember to personalize the issue. Include examples from your experiences and the experiences of your community to illustrate your position (that’s why your ‘Storytellers’ are so important—everybody remembers a fact or argument that’s embedded in a story better than in isolation). Members of Congress and their staff need to know how issues affect their constituencies. Don’t try to overpower them with numbers; give them the human side. Make the Member/staffer say yes or no to people, not abstractions.

6. Consider yourself the expert.

Members and their staff have limited time and resources to spend on any one issue. Remember, you know more about how various actions are impacting our oceans than they do– a staffer may not even know what non-point source pollution is. Explain such concepts—clearly and succinctly. Keep linking them to your request in the future as you continue to work with the office. Offer to provide them with any information that they may need on Blue issues.

One day, the Member’s office may call you for help—then you know you have established strong, credible relationship.

7. Be honest.

If you don’t know the answer to a question, tell them you will find out the answer and get back to them. There is no shame in getting back in touch, and the most valuable commodity you have in this relationship is your credibility.

8. Listen.

Don’t do all the talking. The Member/staff might have legitimate concerns that you can address. And it is always useful to know as much as possible about their position, whether or not you agree with it. Don’t be afraid to ask questions—more information is ALWAYS useful to have.

After the Lobby Visit

9. Follow up:

Be sure to leave your name, address, and phone umber and to ask for the staff person’s card. Whether or not they agree with you, when you get home, write a letter thanking the Member/staff for meeting with you. Remind them of what they have agreed to do and ask that she/he write to inform you of the results of that action. Include any information you promised to follow-up with, or indicate when it will be sent.

Remember: Any relationship requires ongoing communication, getting to know someone, and ideally spending some time with him or her. Try to get the Member/staffer to agree to do something – and keep calling them back until they do it, or say that they won’t do it. You’ll have to be very persistent, especially before you have a relationship. Power will make the staffer more likely to work with you – so organizational letters, seaweed grass roots letters, and media coverage and editorial support are all very important. But… always be polite, if firm.

Do: Use positive reinforcement whenever you can. If a staffer really comes through for you, write a letter to the Member praising his/her work.

10. Keep the door open: Even if your Member does not agree with your position, never write her/him off. Consider every meeting or letter an investment in future policy discussions. Add the member/staff to your mailing list and invite them to do a site-visit with you. Establish an on-going relationship with your Member and staff.

Some last Helpful Hints:

Don’t: be “all business” all the time. Get to know them. Ask how they got into this kind of work, and why. Tell them your story, and learn theirs.

Do: Try to get staff and the Member/Senator to go on a tour in the home district.

Do: Think about local “grasstops” (e.g., local businesspeople , local government officials) who could lobby the target on your behalf in the future.

Do: Consider other local media outreach and seaweed advocacy approaches. Once again, the more the target sees that you can deliver both positive and negative reinforcement through local advocacy/media activities, the more leverage you will have the next time you contact the office.

Throughout

11. Have fun – remember, these folks work for YOU. This is your opportunity to make our democracy work.

Local elections - John Moreland looks to be your man!

Anyone who thinks Penzance's waterfont and all the fishing, business, tourism, leisure and travel revenue that it generates deserves more investment should seriously consider voting for independent Central Ward candidate John Moreland.

Monday's many megrim'd market!

It's scalloping time in the south west...

looks like the Dora et Labora has her twin rig gear back aboard...

though she has to catch a huge anmount of fish to pay her fuel bill...

on a slightly smaller scale, this punt could go for a year on what the big dutch trawler burns in a day...

the two-masted Irene  gives tha hrabour ma taste of the classics...

on her way to the next wind farm...

two of the Hosking fleet...

a good show of fish from a handful of boats on Monday's market...

including some delicious Dovers...

and adorable Dory...

these two were having words...

before going off in search of breakfast...

catch the latest show at the bucca gallery...

which is very graphic this time round.

Judicial Review from UNITED KINGDOM ASSOCIATION OF FISH PRODUCER ORGANISATIONS

UNITED KINGDOM ASSOCIATION OF FISH PRODUCER ORGANISATIONS

Press release:

In advance of the start on 1st May of Judicial Review proceedings in the Royal Courts of Justice, Jim Portus, Chairman of the UK Association of Fish Producer Organisations (UKAFPO), made the following statement:

“This Judicial Review action is about the decision of Defra Minister, Richard Benyon, to step outside the UK fish quotas distribution methodology that has been established, used and understood by the industry since 1999. Since that year, Fixed Quota Allocation units (FQAs) have been attached to fishing licences, traded and subjected to taxation as business assets. Coincident with the on-going management, control and shrinkage of the over 10 metre commercial fleets, there has been growth of the under 10 metre fishing sector’s catching capacity, belatedly followed by monitoring of their catches. This too has been under government procedures and scrutiny.

To a large extent the over-fishing and over-capacity problems of the over 10 metre fleet have been solved by large-scale publicly funded scrapping and industry led re-structuring, such that our quotas are not being exceeded and as a result the fish stocks are returning to healthy populations. The under 10 metre sector however continues to have excess capacity. The contested decisions do very little to assist the required transition of the under 10 metre sector, yet they destabilise the wider industry. The Producer Organisations have been assisting government and the under 10 metre sector to help them find solutions to match capacity with opportunity. Quotas they need and can use have been transferred regularly within year to support seasonal economic activity. There is a continuing willingness for such mechanisms to be used as before and within the framework of the established rules.

However, our members have objected to permanent removal of FQA units and associated quotas from their licences. Our members have built, restructured and rationalised their businesses and paid tax in the understanding that such FQAs are stable entitlements treated as business assets. Investment decisions have been taken on this basis. The Minister now proposes to change the rules of the game after these decisions have been taken by taking these assets without paying compensation.

UKAFPO believes the problems of the under 10 metre fishermen cannot be solved in such a way. Having endeavoured time and again to persuade the Minister to back-track and think again we have decided there is no choice but to seek a resolution in the Courts.”

Jim Portus. Chairman UKAFPO. Monday, 29 April 2013