='"loading" + data:blog.mobileClass'>

Monday 25 February 2019

Monday morning market in Newlyn - Fishermen's Arms up in flames.


Newlyn can always guarantee an excellent mix of rays landed on the market and this Monday, despite fish from only a couple of beam trawlers, was no exception...



along with a good supply of monk tails... 


lemon sole...


brill...


even more ray...


which fish is this?..


the colourful red mullet...


almost tropical looking John Dory...


and a particularly large cuttlefish specimen...


the beam trawlers do their bit to help keep the crabber fleet in bait...


while Dover...




lemons...


and megrim sole go to make up the bulk of a beam trawler's trip by weight if not value...

 


the odd box of octopus...


ray wings show just how meaty these delicious fish are... 



while the fine weather over the weekend allowed the handline fleet from St Ives to pitch in with some good catches of mackerel...



there's one of your boxes Mr Pascoe...


clear the decks, all is set for another trip...


Venture II prepares to land at the market...


in the early hours of this morning, four people were taken to hospital for treatment after one of Newlyn historic pubs, the Fishermen's Arms was gutted by fire...


looks like another Fishermen's Mission ceramic fish has been completed and is all set to be auctioned to help raise funds for the Mission's work in supporting fishermen and their families in times of personal need.. 


while Tom, created in tribute to all those who have lost their lives providing fish...


is greeted by another stunning break of day.

Saturday 23 February 2019

Employment statistics for UK fishing fleet published



New report reveals employment situation in the UK catching sector.

The ‘2018 Employment in the UK Fishing Fleet’ report has been published by Seafish, the public body that supports the £10bn UK seafood industry. Presenting data on the nationality, gender, age, qualification, work pattern and ways of paying workers in the UK catching sector on board and onshore, the report highlights that:

  • 85% of jobs in a sample of 730 jobs were filled by UK workers.
  • Non-UK workers were found mainly on demersal trawlers over 18m and Nephrops trawlers registered in Scotland and Northern Ireland and mainly serve as deckhands, engineers and in other on board roles.
  • The vast majority of jobs in the sample (99%) were filled by men, with women working mostly in onshore roles, typically within family businesses.
  • The average age of workers in the sample was 42, with crew (average age of 38) generally younger than vessel owners (average age of 50.)
  • The highest level of qualification held by most crew was their Basic Safety Training, a minimum requirement for working on board.
  • Nearly three quarters of vessel owners had a higher professional qualification, such as a skipper certification.
  • The most common working pattern for on board workers was full time, all year round work. For on shore workers it was mainly part time, all year round work.
  • The majority of vessel owners and employees were paid a crew share (a share of the income from sales of fish after operating costs are deducted.)
  • EU workers were generally found to be paid via a fixed salary while non-EU workers tended to be employed via crewing agencies.


Commenting on the report Marta Moran Quintana, Economics Researcher, Seafish said:

“From small family businesses to large scale operations, this report helps us to better understand the people that power the UK fishing fleet.

“Providing a snapshot of employment in the fleet captured in the summer 2018, the results are perhaps not surprising but nevertheless they provide insight of the make-up of the catching sector.

“We hope they will be useful in assisting discussions and informing decisions on the employment situation and needs of the UK catching sector, particularly as the UK prepares to leave the European Union.”

Researchers interviewed nearly 300 skippers and vessel owners to establish employment data of over 700 jobs. The composition of the sample roughly reflects the composition of the fleet by home nation, vessel length and fishing technique. Seafish intends to collate and report on this data at regular intervals into the future.

The full report can be accessed here.

Is fishing during the breeding season incompatible with the renewal of stocks?

Is fishing during the breeding season incompatible with the renewal of stocks?


This section aims to provide objective answers to various questions that may arise about the resource and the fishing profession. For the second episode of "Fishing in questions", Alain Biseau, project manager at Ifremer, coordinator of fisheries expertise (Department of Biological Resources and Environment) and member of the ICES advisory committee agreed to answer our questions on the renewal of fish populations.



Q What are the conditions that ensure the renewal of a population?


Renewal of a population is assured when births compensate for deaths. A population is in equilibrium when the small fish of reproduction come to replace the fish, caught or dead in a natural way (predation, old age ...).

Ensuring the renewal, the balance, of a population is essential to the sustainability of fishing; the size of the population must be compatible with management objectives and economic profitability. Obviously, the smaller the population, the greater the risk of collapse of the resource and the fishery (which does not mean extinction of the species). There is therefore a minimum threshold of biomass below which we must not fall: it is the precautionary approach. The current management objectives that target the RMD imply keeping the populations above this minimum threshold.

Q What are the factors that can have an effect (positive / negative) on the renewal of a population and in what way?

The factors that affect the dynamics of a population and therefore its renewal are numerous. Fishing is one of many; environmental factors such as the quality of water, habitats and the ecosystem in general (including availability of food, presence or absence of predators, wind direction and currents transporting eggs and larvae) are equally important.

Fishing is often the adjustment variable because it is easier to control than the other environmental factors conditioning renewal. There are few possible human actions to positively influence the renewal of a population (difficult to consider putting ice in the sea to cool it as noted (with good reason!) A former president of the CNPMEM) except limit negative impacts (reduction of fishing effort, spatio-temporal closure). In some particular cases, however, the establishment of artificial reefs may help to improve population renewal, either by limiting fishing or by providing habitats favorable to the development of eggs and larvae.

Q What is the relationship between spawning biomass and the level of recruitment?


To have babies, you need parents. No breeding, no new births and therefore no recruitment, this is the only certainty. But, beyond a certain amount, an increase in the number of breeders does not systematically lead to an increase in recruits, when certain environmental conditions induce high mortality of the young stages. On the contrary, it has often been observed that when the number of breeders is lower, the survival rate of eggs and larvae is better. There is therefore no direct proportionality between breeding biomass and recruitment beyond a certain threshold.

Below this threshold, the risk of collapse (very low level of recruitment and therefore no renewal of the stock) is high. This is called a precautionary threshold or biological safety limit.

Is there an optimum period (in relation to breeding) for fishing? In other words: when to fish? before, during or after the breeding season?

A fish caught before, during or after the breeding season is primarily a dead fish. Fished before, it will not contribute to the reproduction of the year, but fished after, it will not contribute to that of the following year ... From the strict point of view of the quantity of reproducers, it is advisable to frame / to limit the total annual withdrawals to ensure a sufficient quantity of breeders; the capture period does not matter.

Q Is spawning / spawning compatible with stock renewal and RMD operations?


Once the quantity of breeding stock is maintained at a sufficient level and the breeding process is not affected, spawning or breeding season fishing is not incompatible with the renewal of the stock and its exploitation at RMD.

Q Is spawning fishing a risk of collapse for fish stocks?

To qualify the previous answer, even if the spawning level is maintained at a sufficient level at the stock level, fishing on the spawning grounds may present two risks: the first is the disturbance by fishing (but this is also true for any other anthropogenic activity) of the reproduction process (dispersion of the benches, acoustic interference, etc.). The second is the possible local depletion (we capture all the fish of a spawning ground) which would lead to an impoverishment of the genetic diversity of the populations concerned and therefore of their potential of adaptation.

In short, fishing on the spawning grounds, when spawners congregate, can only be considered with the guarantee of maintaining a sufficient level of breeding stock and genetic diversity. It can not be conceived without strict supervision.

Q Are there critical operating thresholds at which managers need to adopt management measures specific to the breeding season?

When a resource is very over-exploited (very low number of breeders) all means must be deployed to ensure its recovery. The protection or restoration of areas of fishing interest (spawning grounds, but also nurseries) is one of the means. The measures taken in this case must then concern all human activities (fishing and others).

In addition, when several trades target a stock, some during the breeding season with large catches, others throughout the year with smaller catches, the necessary reduction in total catches is often easier to obtain (and generally impacts fewer vessels) by limiting fishing during the breeding season, and therefore the activity of a trade type.

Q What are the advantages and disadvantages of spawning?


There is a need to distinguish between spawning (area and time when fish are concentrated for reproduction) and fishing during the breeding season (without breeding concentration).

Fishing during the breeding season has no advantage or disadvantage (except those possibly related to the quality of the fish and / or its recovery) provided that the maintenance of a minimum quantity of breeders is ensured by an overall limitation of catches and / or or good selectivity. Regarding spawning, we have already mentioned the disadvantages (behavioral disturbance, risk of genetic impoverishment), but there may be advantages: for vessels targeting fish concentrations (especially during the breeding season) the quantity of fish caught per unit effort (and therefore per liter of diesel) is higher than that captured the rest of the year. However, the activity of these targeted fisheries on concentrations can strongly impact that of other trades, especially those who practice all year; not to mention recreational fishing.

So there are advantages and disadvantages. Fisheries management must reconcile the three pillars of sustainable development: environmental, economic and social. For sequential fisheries (catches of a stock made by several trades that succeed one another over time) a sharing of fishing opportunities between all users (or even a sharing of space) seems essential. This sharing is not biology but a political decision.

Q Is the share of EU-level breeding catches compared to total catches known?


Not really. However, since the catches are made, most of the year, those caught during the breeding season constitute a significant proportion of the total catches.

Translated by Google - Full story here:

Friday 22 February 2019

Latest training information from Seafood Cornwall Training.









We have just set out our training programme dates for spring 2019. if you know anyone interested in a career at sea then point the in the direction of Myriam at Seafood Cornwall Training for more information and support.

Final February #FishyFriday in Newlyn.


A huge spring tide and fresh winds have kept all the inshore boats and punts in port alongside the netting fleet so with just a couple of beam trawlers landing this morning supplies were well reduced, a handful of boxes of cuttles...



slack boxes of fish like ray, gurnard and rounds...



meant that smaller buyers were able to pick up the odd box of fish for reasonable money...



although there were good supplies of mackerel from the very much sheltered St Ives Bay...



are now much more accurately graded...



from each boat...



by the new grader setup...



megrims from the beam trawler Trevessa IV...



seem to have gone down well with some of the buyers...



while others fought over a handful of haddock...



plaice...



and brill...



together with a few small cod...



with much milder weather each morning seems to edge closer to more Spring-like conditions...



with all of the boats...



in the harbour



were riding high at the top of the tide...



though the moon...



is now in its Gibbous waning stage...



helping to illuminate the boats...



along with...



the rising sun, yet to break the horizon...



bringing out the best in this Cornish Lass...



in a harbour packed with the entire inshore fleet...



all the smaller bats can do is take advantage of the high tide to swap gear ready for the next trip as the weather and tides ease off...



in the meantime ropes...



and nets remain idle...



as the sun finally breaks free...



of the horizon just south of the Lizard...



a heavy surge in the harbour forces the Ripple  away from the quayside...



while the Plymouth registered beam trawler Admiral Benbow gets ready to sail...



there are still a few jobs to complete on the slip-bound Karen of Ladram.

Thursday 21 February 2019

Third Country Fishing in a No Deal


80% OF THE FISH WE CATCH IS EXPORTED, 70% OF THE FISH WE EAT IS IMPORTED

Exporting and importing fish if there’s a ‘No deal’ Brexit – The amount of paperwork (or rather online forms) that will be necessary for fishermen has been outlined.

The government this week published guidance to UK fishermen and fish merchants on the hoops they will have to jump through to export and import wild-caught marine fish if the UK wakes up without a deal on the 29th March.

This is because, if no deal is agreed, the UK will become a ‘third country’ in EU terms, that is one with no international agreement with the union.

MPs voted against no deal in an amendment to the withdrawal agreement, but this is not a sure promise and it is unlikely that Theresa May will get support for her deal without altering the controversial backstop, which requires European agreement.

Fishing under a ‘No Deal’

Approx 80% of the fish we catch is exported, about 70% of the fish we eat is imported.

Fish for export will have to have a veterinary check and several certificates that are not necessary now, and they will have to enter the EU at a port with an inspection post, which not all have.

The EU’s regulation states that only fish products accompanied by a validated catch certificate can enter the EU.

Currently, as a Member State, the UK does not have to issue catch certificates for EU trade but this will change if we leave with no deal in place.

To get a catch certificate, which shows the fish was caught legally, fishermen will have to follow several steps, including the completing of an online catch certificate form for each consignment of fish and having this validated by the UK fisheries authority.

Catch certificates aren’t needed to export farmed fish and farmed shellfish, freshwater fish or freshwater shellfish, fish fry or larvae and some molluscs.

The guidance confirmed that to move fish or fishery products from the UK to the EU under No Deal, businesses will also need an Export Health Certificate (EHC) signed by an Official Vet or an Environmental Health Officer.

Because the UK will become a third country, fishermen will also have to send any consignments of UK-caught fish and fishery products to the EU via a border inspection post (BIP).

Plymouth and Roscoff will both need upgrading to meet the required standard and volume of work.

The current situation with other third country fish and exports to and from third countries remains the same.

Exporters may also need any of the following that the EU uses to monitor fishing activity and prevent illegal, unreported or unregulated fishing:
a prior notification form
a pre-landing declaration
a storage document
a processing statement

These documents will be available before the end of March on the government website.

The process for importing fish from the EU will be a similar process, but reversed.

Redruth MP George Eustice as Fishing Minister say of course that leaving the EU with a deal remains the Government’s top priority and publishing guidance to the industry doesn’t mean that policy has changed.

A Defra spokesperson told us this week

“We remain focused on securing an agreement with the EU – but we must prepare for all possible outcomes.

“In the event that the UK leaves the EU on 29 March 2019 without an implementation period, catch certificates will need to be used to trade fish and fish products with the EU. Exporters therefore need time to become familiar with the new requirements and the impacts on their business.


The guidance published is designed to help businesses understand what they need to do to prepare for a no deal scenario. Further information about the process for completing these documents will be available in the coming weeks.”

Defra also said that The Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA) is working with industry to make sure there are extra trained and authorised signatories to help manage additional EHC applications. A new EHC form finder tool on GOV.UK will enable businesses to download the forms and guidance that they need.




Where will these fish landed at Newlyn go?

Reaction

Luke Pollard is the chair of Labour Friends of Fishing parliamentary Group and MP for Plymouth Sutton and Devonport. He told Cornish Stuff:

“We know that exporting under a no deal scenario is going to be difficult and complicated. It not only requires customs and border checks, additional forms to be filled in and so on, but it also requires the government to have the systems in place for any exporters and businesses to access that in a simple and easy manner and at the moment I have serious doubts as to whether the systems are in place and it will be as easy as ministers suggest it will be.”

“We have got some of the way there but not enough to make the system work. I can’t see how that can happen before March. There’s been no planning applications submitted for customs facilities in Plymouth. There’s been no extra customs staff or environmental health staff hired, so I don’t see how you could have those systems in place being as it is just over some forty days away now.

“So this is where for me it is a complete myth that the country is ready to leave with no deal. The false threat of leaving with no deal doesn’t work, the EU know that it would cause considerable economic damage to our economy, we know it would have disastrous consequences for our key industries, so it seems to be a complete false threat”

“But what worries me about this government is that knowing the huge economic damage that this could cause, they are still ploughing ahead with this being an available option. That’s why Labour have been calling for no-deal to be taken off the table”





Mr Pollard continued, “Article 50 needs to be extended if we are going to have the time for a creation of a deal that parliament can get behind but also time for British businesses to adapt to whatever new system we are having after we leave the European Union”

“It is complete pie-in-the-sky to believe that British businesses can have a robust system in place by 29th March simply because the government has no plans whatsoever of having the robust systems in place that we need to make a no-deal work”

“In the Westcountry, fish exports and agricultural exports are really important to our economy. We export 80% of what we catch and we import 70% of what we eat. That means we need to have frictionless trade at the border. Everyday that no deal remains on the table is one more day where investment is put off and one more day when businesses are wondering what’s going to happen after the 29th. It’s really worrying“

Colin Martin is the Liberal Democrat parliamentary candidate MP for South East Cornwall, the seat of Sheryll Murray, the unofficial fishing champion of the Tory backbenches. Murray’s security of a 17,000 majority in the seat is largely thought to be due for her support for the industry and her uncompromising promotion of a hard Brexit. She is currently supporting the ‘Malthouse Compromise’ in Parliament.

Cllr Martin said “A huge proportion of the fish landed in Cornwall is put straight on a truck to France or Spain, or even on a plane to Japan”

“For years, Sheryll Murray has been telling fishing communities in South East Cornwall that the Common Fisheries Policy was to blame for all our problems and that leaving the EU would be the solution.”

Cllr Colin Martin, Lib Dem parliamentary candidate for South East Cornwall
Mr Martin said: “Unfortunately just like every other part of Brexit, the Government simply hasn’t made adequate plans for a no-deal scenario. Whilst it may be the case that a no-deal Brexit would get us out of the CFP, we’d be left with the problem of who would eat all the fish we catch.”

EU Exit: road haulage

Fish loaded and ready to leave Newlyn
Another problem associated with the industry is the uncertainty over haulage licences. It’s one thing catching the fish and going through the hoops to export them but you also need to get them from market to market, and off this island.

Hauliers are currently waiting with baited breath to find out if they have won a precious licence to carry on trading as they are now.

The minister responsible, Jesse Norman MP gave a written statement to parliament this week. It said,

“The government is making preparations to allow hauliers and other businesses to continue to transport goods between the UK and the EU, once the UK has left the EU. These include preparations for leaving the EU without a withdrawal agreement.

The European Commission has proposed legislation that would allow UK hauliers basic rights to conduct operations to, from and through the EU for a limited period of 9 months after exit, if there is no deal. This proposal is predicated on the UK’s granting equivalent access for EU hauliers to the UK.”


“A multilateral quota of transport licences was introduced by the European Conference of Ministers of Transport (ECMT) in 1974 to support liberalised road freight transport between member states of that body. The licences, known as ECMT permits, allow for access between the 43 member states (which include all EU member states except Cyprus). The UK has an allocation of 984 annual and 2,832 short-term (valid for 30 days) ECMT permits for 2019.

These levels were agreed through a long-standing formula approach before it was known that the UK would be leaving the EU.

The government’s expectation is that hauliers should not need an ECMT permit to continue doing a range of business in all or much of the EU, even in the event of no deal.”

UK hauliers have been applying for ECMT permits and the government expects to inform applicants of the outcome of their applications later this week.

“Overall, we continue to believe that reciprocal market access will be secured for UK hauliers. While continuing to plan for all eventualities, we also believe that it is right to underline the fact that the UK is taking a positive and pragmatic approach.”

by Kira Taylor, Cornish Stuff Reporter

Full story courtesy of Cornish Stuff - a new look at what is happening in and around Cornwall.